Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Temporal artery-based forehead flap

R H Mathog, R O Smith

    Head & Neck Surgery
    |November 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Forehead flap reconstruction offers reliable correction for head and neck defects. This study evaluates delayed versus nondelayed techniques, assessing outcomes and patient morbidity for various reconstructive sites.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Computers and the occupational therapy administrator - 1985.

    Occupational therapy in health care·2013
    Same author

    The treatment of bacterial endocarditis with penicillin.

    The Journal of laboratory and clinical medicine·2010
    Same author

    Functional outcomes of the retromaxillary-infratemporal fossa dissection for advanced head and neck/skull base lesions.

    Skull base surgery·2006
    Same author

    Research over the next century: impact of technology.

    The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association·2002
    Same author

    Craniocervical necrotizing fasciitis: an 11-year experience.

    Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery·2001
    Same author

    Titanium mesh repair of the severely comminuted frontal sinus fracture.

    Archives of otolaryngology--head & neck surgery·2001
    Same journal

    Ethical dilemmas in head and neck cancer.

    Head & neck surgery·1989
    Same journal

    Nasal septal melanoma.

    Head & neck surgery·1988
    Same journal

    Malignant oncocytoma of the maxillary sinus--an ultrastructural study.

    Head & neck surgery·1988
    Same journal

    Adult parapharyngeal extracardiac rhabdomyoma.

    Head & neck surgery·1988
    Same journal

    Retropharyngeal infiltrating lipoma--a case report.

    Head & neck surgery·1988
    Same journal

    Lymphoma presenting as a salivary gland mass.

    Head & neck surgery·1988
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Plastic Surgery
    • Reconstructive Surgery
    • Head and Neck Surgery

    Background:

    • The forehead flap is a versatile reconstructive tool.
    • Understanding its historical development and varied applications is crucial for optimizing outcomes.
    • Evaluating different techniques, such as delayed and nondelayed flaps, is essential for refining surgical practice.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To review the historical development of the forehead flap.
    • To describe an operative experience with delayed and nondelayed forehead flap techniques in 30 cases.
    • To evaluate the reliability of the forehead flap for correcting defects in various head and neck sites, considering patient morbidity and functional outcomes.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of historical literature on forehead flap development.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of 30 cases involving delayed and nondelayed forehead flap reconstructions.
  • Evaluation of patient morbidity, complication rates, and hospital stay.
  • Assessment of functional and aesthetic correction in sites including the cheek, lip, oral cavity, pharynx, and tonsil.

    • Main Results:

    • The forehead flap demonstrates reliability in reconstructing diverse head and neck defects.
    • Analysis of 30 cases provides insights into the outcomes of delayed versus nondelayed techniques.
    • Complications and length of hospital stay were analyzed in relation to the reconstructive methods used.
    • Individual cases illustrate the advantages and disadvantages of different forehead flap techniques.

    Conclusions:

    • The forehead flap is a reliable method for head and neck reconstruction.
    • Both delayed and nondelayed techniques offer viable options, with specific advantages and disadvantages.
    • Careful consideration of technique and patient factors is key to successful forehead flap reconstruction.