Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Prisons following reform. Current status and prospects]

R Ciccotti

    Quaderni Di Criminologia Clinica
    |October 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary

    The 1975 prison reform shows mixed results due to incomplete application and misinterpretations. Addressing these issues is crucial for the reform

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    [Penal institutions in Porto Azzuro].

    Quaderni di criminologia clinicaยท1976
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Criminology
    • Penal Law
    • Sociology of Law

    Context:

    • Post-1975 prison system reforms in Italy.
    • Incomplete implementation and distorted interpretations of penal regulations.
    • Analysis of both positive and negative outcomes of the prison reform.

    Purpose:

    • To critically evaluate the application of the 1975 prison reform.
    • To identify negative aspects arising from incomplete implementation and misinterpretations.
    • To review the positive achievements and suggest improvements for the prison system.

    Summary:

    • The study examines the period after July 1975, focusing on the incomplete application of the new prison system.
    • It highlights negative consequences of distorted interpretations of regulations, particularly Article 30.
    • Positive aspects include improved disciplinary approaches, rehabilitation efforts, and alternative sentencing measures.

    Impact:

    • Correction of procedural errors is vital to prevent revisions or abrogation of the reform.
    • Ensuring proper functioning of special prisons and equitable treatment.
    • Recommendations for enhancing the roles of surveillance judges, directors, and prison personnel.

    Related Experiment Videos