Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Aspects on personal noise protection

K Axelsson, A Axelsson, A Jonsson

    Scandinavian Audiology
    |January 1, 1978
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Workers with normal hearing used ear protection more than those with hearing loss. However, some workers with hearing loss used protection, and some without hearing loss did not, highlighting varied compliance and awareness of noise-induced hearing loss risks.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Data of the Insect Biome Atlas: a metabarcoding survey of the terrestrial arthropods of Sweden and Madagascar.

    Scientific data·2025
    Same author

    Determination of the source location of anthropogenic radionuclides collected in Finland and Sweden in June 2020 using a multi-technology analysis.

    Journal of environmental radioactivity·2024
    Same author

    Third international challenge to model the medium- to long-range transport of radioxenon to four Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty monitoring stations.

    Journal of environmental radioactivity·2022
    Same author

    The SOFIA pilot trial: a cluster-randomized trial of coordinated, co-produced care to reduce mortality and improve quality of life in people with severe mental illness in the general practice setting.

    Pilot and feasibility studies·2021
    Same author

    Urologic, lymphedema, pelvic pain and gastrointestinal symptoms increase after radiotherapy in patients with primary uterine tumors: a prospective longitudinal Swedish cohort study.

    Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico·2021
    Same author

    Measurement of radioxenon and radioargon in soil gas collected in the region of Kvarntorp, Sweden.

    Journal of environmental radioactivity·2020
    Same journal

    Vision and hearing in old age.

    Scandinavian audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Two families with phenotypically different hereditary low frequency hearing impairment: longitudinal data and linkage analysis.

    Scandinavian audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Age and noise-induced hearing loss.

    Scandinavian audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Bilateral hearing aids--effects and consequences from a user perspective.

    Scandinavian audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Threshold-based fitting methods for non-linear (WDRC) hearing instruments--comparison of acoustic characteristics.

    Scandinavian audiology·2002
    Same journal

    Will hearing healthcare be affordable in the new millennium.

    Scandinavian audiology·2001
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Occupational Health
    • Audiology
    • Environmental Health

    Background:

    • Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) is a significant occupational hazard.
    • The effectiveness of personal protective equipment (PPE), specifically ear protectors, in preventing NIHL is crucial.
    • Worker compliance and awareness regarding hearing protection are key factors in mitigating risks.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare ear protector usage between noise-exposed workers with normal hearing and those with severe noise-induced hearing loss.
    • To investigate reasons for non-use of ear protectors and assess the condition and replacement frequency of used protectors.
    • To identify factors influencing the effectiveness of hearing protection in occupational settings.

    Main Methods:

    • Comparative study of two groups of noise-exposed workers (normal hearing vs. severe hearing loss).

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of ear protector usage patterns, including type, condition, and replacement frequency.
  • Analysis of self-reported reasons for non-use of hearing protection.

    • Main Results:

    • Workers with normal hearing reported significantly higher usage of ear protectors compared to those with severe hearing loss.
    • A notable proportion of workers had normal hearing despite prolonged noise exposure without protection, while some with hearing loss used protectors frequently.
    • Common reasons for non-use included lack of awareness of hazardous noise levels; preferred protector types varied (plastic ear plugs 44%, vinyl foam 26%, fibreglass 18%, ear muffs 11%).

    Conclusions:

    • Ear protector usage is strongly associated with the absence of noise-induced hearing loss.
    • Despite this association, individual variability exists, with some workers experiencing hearing loss despite protection and others maintaining hearing without it.
    • Increased awareness of workplace noise hazards and consistent, correct use of appropriate ear protection are essential for preventing occupational hearing loss.