Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multiple estimation of concentrations in immunoassay using logistic models

J F Robison-Cox1

  • 1Department of Mathematical Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman 59717, USA.

Journal of Immunological Methods
|October 12, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Common immunoassay methods provide approximate error estimates. New techniques improve accuracy for simultaneous inference, addressing limitations in current calibration interval calculations for multiple analyte estimations.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluation of nearest-neighbor methods for detection of chimeric small-subunit rRNA sequences.

Applied and environmental microbiology·1995
Same author

Age structure of horn fly (Diptera: Muscidae) populations estimated by pterin concentrations.

Journal of medical entomology·1992
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Biochemistry
  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Statistical Modeling

Background:

  • Immunoassay techniques estimate analyte concentrations using reference solutions.
  • Current nonlinear logistic models yield approximate error estimates and confidence levels.
  • Standard methods often fail to account for simultaneous inference in repeated standard curve use.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To describe alternative methods for immunoassay calibration that account for simultaneous inference.
  • To compare the performance of different calibration interval methods under specific data distributions.
  • To highlight the limitations of commonly used methods in providing accurate confidence levels.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized simulations with normally distributed data where variance is proportional to a power of the mean.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Compared various methods for obtaining calibration intervals.
  • Evaluated the accuracy and coverage of different estimation techniques.

    • Main Results:

    • Commonly used calibration interval methods offer approximate coverage, even for single estimations.
    • These methods are unsuitable for multiple estimations and comparative analyses.
    • Alternative methods were developed to address the 'simultaneous' inference issue.

    Conclusions:

    • Existing immunoassay calibration interval methods are imprecise for multiple analyte estimations.
    • The development of methods accounting for simultaneous inference is crucial for accurate bioanalytical results.
    • Further research is needed to refine statistical approaches in immunoassays.