Comparative in vitro killing activity of meropenem versus imipenem against multiresistant nosocomial Pseudomonas

E J Giamarellos-Bourboulis1, P Grecka, H Giamarellou

  • 11st Department of Propedeutic Medicine, Laiko General Hospital, University of Athens, Medical School, Greece.

Insights

Meropenem and imipenem show comparable in vitro killing activity against multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa after 24 hours. Meropenem demonstrated a lower rate of resistance development compared to imipenem in this study.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Microbiology
  • Infectious Diseases
  • Antimicrobial Resistance

Background:

  • Multiresistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa poses a significant threat in healthcare settings.
  • Carbapenems, including meropenem and imipenem, are crucial for treating serious P. aeruginosa infections.
  • Understanding the comparative efficacy and resistance development of these agents is vital.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the in vitro killing activity of meropenem and imipenem against multiresistant P. aeruginosa strains.
  • To evaluate the rate of resistance development to meropenem and imipenem during prolonged exposure.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized 14 multiresistant P. aeruginosa clinical isolates, all susceptible to meropenem and imipenem (MIC ≤ 4 µg/ml).
  • Performed 42 killing curves by exposing log-phase bacteria (5 x 10^5 CFU/ml) to 1x minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of each carbapenem.
  • Assessed bacterial viability over 24 hours of incubation.

Main Results:

  • Meropenem exhibited a slower initial killing rate than imipenem within the first 5 hours.
  • Both carbapenems demonstrated equal effectiveness after 24 hours of incubation.
  • Resistance developed in 40% of P. aeruginosa strains to imipenem versus 11.1% to meropenem after 24-hour exposure.

Conclusions:

  • Meropenem and imipenem are both effective against susceptible multiresistant P. aeruginosa in vitro over 24 hours.
  • Meropenem appears to induce resistance at a lower rate than imipenem.
  • Further investigation into the mechanisms underlying differential resistance development is warranted.

Related Concept Videos

Antimicrobial Effectiveness01:28

Antimicrobial Effectiveness

The effectiveness of antimicrobial agents depends on various factors influencing their ability to eliminate microbial populations. Larger microbial populations require more time for complete eradication, emphasizing the importance of population size analysis when evaluating antimicrobial efficacy.Microbial resistance to antimicrobial agents varies significantly. Highly resilient microorganisms include endospores, gram-negative bacteria, and non-enveloped viruses, while prions are exceptionally...
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA01:25

Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA

Antibiotic resistance in bacteria arises when microorganisms evolve the ability to withstand drugs designed to kill them or inhibit their growth, rendering once-effective treatments useless. This phenomenon, driven by genetic change and selection under antibiotic exposure, poses a profound threat to modern medicine. Mechanisms include drug-inactivating enzymes (e.g., β-lactamases), efflux pumps that eject antibiotics, mutations altering antibiotic targets, decreased drug uptake, and acquisition...
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance01:25

Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) presents a critical public health threat, arising from its capacity to resist β-lactam antibiotics due to acquisition of the mecA gene within the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec). This gene encodes penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a), which impairs binding efficacy of methicillin and other β-lactams. MRSA has evolved into distinct clonal lineages impacting humans and animals alike, reinforcing its significance within the One...