Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2026

High Throughput, Real-time, Dual-readout Testing of Intracellular Antimicrobial Activity and Eukaryotic Cell Cytotoxicity
Published on: November 16, 2016
Susceptibility of Streptococcus pyogenes to azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin and roxithromycin in vitro
G J Van Asselt1, J H Sloos, R P Mouton
1Department of Medical Microbiology, University Hospital Leiden, The Netherlands.
Abstract:
The susceptibility of 180 clinical isolates of Streptococcus pyrogenes from six regions of The Netherlands to the macrolide antibiotics azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin and roxithromycin was analysed. The results of a microbroth MIC method, the E-test method and a disk diffusion assay were compared, and the MBC determined. In addition, the susceptibility to erythromycin of 436 clinical isolates of S. pyogenes from the Leiden region was determined. The microbroth MIC90s of azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin and roxithromycin for group A streptococci were < or = 0.5 mg/L. Erythromycin had the lowest MIC90 (0.09 mg/L). The MIC data obtained with the E-test method suggested that clarithromycin and erythromycin had slightly higher anti-streptococcal activity than azithromycin and roxithromycin in vitro. MICs obtained with the E-test were lower than those found with the microbroth method. Only minor discrepancies were observed among the three methods. The MBC50 for both clarithromycin and erythromycin was 0.75 mg/L and 5.0 mg/L for azithromycin and roxithromycin. None of the 180 strains and two of the collection of 436 strains (0.5%) were resistant to erythromycin and the other macrolides tested; MICs ranged from 1 to 16 mg/L. The erythromycin-resistant strains showed an inducible type of macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B (MLS) resistance.
Insights
Streptococcus pyogenes remains highly susceptible to macrolide antibiotics like azithromycin and erythromycin. Resistance is rare, with only 0.5% of strains showing inducible macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Streptococcus pyogenes (group A streptococci) is a significant human pathogen.
- Macrolide antibiotics are crucial for treating S. pyogenes infections.
- Understanding macrolide susceptibility is vital for effective treatment strategies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the in vitro susceptibility of clinical S. pyogenes isolates to four macrolide antibiotics.
- To compare the accuracy of three different antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods.
- To determine the prevalence of macrolide resistance in Dutch S. pyogenes isolates.
Main Methods:
- Testing 180 and 436 clinical S. pyogenes isolates against azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, and roxithromycin.
- Utilizing microbroth MIC, E-test, and disk diffusion assays to determine Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations (MICs) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentrations (MBCs).
- Investigating the resistance mechanisms in erythromycin-resistant strains.
Main Results:
- All tested macrolides demonstrated potent in vitro activity against S. pyogenes, with MIC90 values ≤ 0.5 mg/L.
- Erythromycin exhibited the lowest MIC90 (0.09 mg/L), suggesting slightly higher activity compared to other macrolides.
- Minimal discrepancies were found between the three susceptibility testing methods.
- Macrolide resistance was very low (0.5%), with resistant strains displaying inducible macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance.
Conclusions:
- Clinical isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes in The Netherlands remain highly susceptible to commonly used macrolide antibiotics.
- The macrolide antibiotics azithromycin, clarithromycin, erythromycin, and roxithromycin are effective against S. pyogenes in vitro.
- Inducible macrolide-lincosamide-streptogramin B resistance is the primary mechanism observed in the few resistant strains.
More Related Videos
09:17A Robust Pneumonia Model in Immunocompetent Rodents to Evaluate Antibacterial Efficacy against S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae, K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa or A. baumannii
Published on: January 2, 2017
12:03Antimicrobial Synergy Testing by the Inkjet Printer-assisted Automated Checkerboard Array and the Manual Time-kill Method
Published on: April 18, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Streptococcal Pharyngitis
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Inhibitors of Gram-positive Cell Wall Synthesis
Inhibitors of Bacterial Protein Synthesis
Inhibitors of Bacterial DNA Synthesis
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance