Related Experiment Videos

Surgery for subfoveal membranes in myopia, angioid streaks, and other disorders

D A Adelberg1, L V Del Priore, H J Kaplan

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.

Abstract

Insights

Surgical removal of subfoveal neovascular membranes, excluding age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome (POHS), stabilized or improved vision in 94% of eyes. However, achieving better than 20/80 vision post-surgery was uncommon.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Retinal Diseases
  • Surgical Interventions

Background:

  • Subfoveal neovascular membranes can cause vision loss from various conditions.
  • Exclusion of age-related macular degeneration (AMD) and presumed ocular histoplasmosis syndrome (POHS) allows focus on other etiologies.
  • Surgical intervention for these membranes is considered when conservative treatments fail.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the outcomes of surgical removal of subfoveal neovascular membranes.
  • To assess visual acuity changes and complications in patients undergoing this surgery.
  • To identify the efficacy of surgical intervention for non-AMD/POHS related subfoveal neovascularization.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 17 eyes (16 patients) with subfoveal neovascularization.
  • Causes included myopic degeneration, angioid streaks, idiopathic neovascularization, punctate inner choroidopathy, multifocal choroiditis, and candida chorioretinitis.
  • Surgical removal of the membranes was the primary intervention.

Main Results:

  • Visual acuity remained stable in 59% and improved in 35% of eyes post-surgery.
  • Preoperative visual acuity of 20/80 or better was present in only 6% of eyes, while 29% achieved this post-surgery.
  • Complications included retinal tears, detachment, and cataract formation. Recurrence of neovascularization occurred in 4 eyes.

Conclusions:

  • Surgical removal of subfoveal neovascularization offers a high rate of vision stabilization or improvement (94%).
  • While vision is often preserved or enhanced, achieving excellent visual acuity (better than 20/80) is less common.
  • The procedure carries risks of complications and recurrence, necessitating careful patient selection and follow-up.

Related Concept Videos