Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Peer review in toxicologic pathology

J M Ward1, J F Hardisty, J R Hailey

  • 1National Cancer Institute, Frederick, Maryland 21702-1201, USA.

Toxicologic Pathology
|March 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The protein fraction from wheat-based dried distiller's grain with solubles (DDGS): extraction and valorization.

New biotechnology·2015
Same author

Contributed review: optical micro- and nanofiber pulling rig.

The Review of scientific instruments·2014
Same author

Rodent immunohistochemistry: pitfalls and troubleshooting.

Veterinary pathology·2013
Same author

Estradiol differentially regulates calreticulin: a potential link with abnormal T cell function in systemic lupus erythematosus?

Lupus·2013
Same author

Toward a better understanding of mouse models of disease.

Veterinary pathology·2012
Same author

Pathobiology of aging mice and GEM: background strains and experimental design.

Veterinary pathology·2012

Peer review of animal histopathology findings ensures data integrity in toxicology studies. This process standardizes diagnostics and terminology, crucial for regulatory decisions on chemical safety.

Area of Science:

  • Toxicologic Pathology
  • Veterinary Pathology
  • Regulatory Science

Background:

  • Histopathology peer review in animal safety studies is a recent but vital procedure.
  • It enhances the integrity and consistency of pathology evaluations.
  • Standardized nomenclature, like the Society of Toxicologic Pathologist's Guides, is essential.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To outline the procedures and importance of peer review in toxicologic pathology.
  • To emphasize its role in ensuring data reliability for regulatory submissions.
  • To highlight its function as a continuing education tool for pathologists.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of pathology peer review processes, including tissue/lesion selection and discrepancy resolution.
  • Inclusion of Pathology Working Groups as part of the review.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Consideration of factors influencing the extent of peer review (e.g., study results, size, complexity).

    • Main Results:

    • Peer review ensures diagnostic consistency and common terminology in safety assessments.
    • It provides a mechanism for resolving disagreements among pathologists.
    • The process contributes to the overall quality of data used in regulatory decision-making.

    Conclusions:

    • Pathology peer review is critical for validating animal toxicology study findings.
    • Standardized approaches and clear documentation are key components.
    • The process ultimately supports informed regulatory decisions regarding chemical safety.