Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Acoustic cues and postural control

H Petersen1, M Magnusson, R Johansson

  • 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
|June 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Soft Palate Enables Extreme Feeding and Explosive Breathing in the Fin Whale (<i>Balaenoptera physalus</i>).

Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England)·2024
Same author

Brain network dynamics in the alpha band during a complex postural control task.

Journal of neural engineering·2023
Same author

Postural control paradigm (BioVRSea): towards a neurophysiological signature.

Physiological measurement·2022
Same author

Intraoperative ultrasound imaging in the surgical treatment of congenital hyperinsulinism: prospective, blinded study.

BJS open·2021
Same author

Value of regular endosonography and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose PET-CT after surgery for gastro-oesophageal junction, stomach or pancreatic cancer.

BJS open·2021
Same author

Cortical recruitment and functional dynamics in postural control adaptation and habituation during vibratory proprioceptive stimulation.

Journal of neural engineering·2019
Same journal

Validity of ambulatory accelerometry to quantify physical activity in heart failure.

Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine·2001
Same journal

Feasibility of, and success in adopting a low-fat diet in coronary patients.

Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine·2001
Same journal

Use of healthcare, impact on family caregivers and patient satisfaction of rehabilitation at home after stroke in southwest Stockholm.

Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine·2001
Same journal

Changes in balance performance in physically active elderly people aged 73-80.

Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine·2001
Same journal

Muscle performance in an urban population sample of 40- to 79-year-old men and women.

Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine·2001
Same journal

Current status of rehabilitation, especially in patients with stroke, in Japan.

Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine·2001
See all related articles

Auditory feedback signals can improve postural control during low-intensity balance challenges. However, this auditory input did not aid balance during high-intensity perturbations, suggesting other strategies are employed.

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Human Motor Control

Background:

  • Postural control is essential for maintaining balance.
  • Auditory cues can potentially influence motor control and balance.
  • Understanding how different types of auditory input affect postural stability is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the effects of auditory feedback and field orientation input on postural control.
  • To determine if auditory cues can mitigate body sway during vibratory perturbations.
  • To explore the influence of vibratory stimulus intensity on the efficacy of auditory input.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments were conducted on healthy volunteers using a force platform to measure body sway.
  • Auditory input included force platform feedback and auditory clicks for field orientation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stance perturbations were induced by low (120mW) and high (850mW) intensity calf muscle vibration with eyes open or closed.

    • Main Results:

    • Auditory feedback significantly reduced body sway during low-intensity vibration.
    • High-intensity vibration-induced body sway was not significantly affected by auditory feedback.
    • Field orientation input did not reduce body sway at low-intensity vibration.

    Conclusions:

    • Auditory feedback aids postural control under specific conditions (low-intensity perturbations).
    • The effectiveness of auditory feedback may be limited by the intensity and speed of postural disturbances.
    • Cognitive processing limitations might hinder the use of field orientation cues for rapid postural adjustments.