Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Computer-generated admission forms have greater accuracy

M P Dombrowski1, M W Tomlinson, S F Bottoms

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University/Hutzel Hospital, Detroit, MI 48201, USA.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
|September 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temporal complexity of LVV-hemorphin-7 allosterism at the angiotensin II type 1 receptor assessed using entropy-based approaches.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2025
Same author

Radiation dose reduction in pediatric computed tomography (CT) using deep convolutional neural network denoising.

Clinical radiology·2024
Same author

Diffuse Calvarial Hyperostosis and Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: A Case-Control Study.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2022
Same author

Reply.

Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology·2020
Same author

In vitro fertilization analysis of squirrel monkey oocytes produced by various follicular induction regimens and the incidence of triploidy.

American journal of primatology·2020
Same author

Evaluation of Lower-Dose Spiral Head CT for Detection of Intracranial Findings Causing Neurologic Deficits.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2019
Same journal

Likelihood ratios enhance clinical interpretation of metagenomic prediction of early-onset neonatal sepsis in preterm premature rupture of membranes (Letter-to-the-Editor).

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Taking risk stratification in preterm premature rupture of membranes to the bedside (Reply to Letter-to-the-Editor).

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Gestational Age at Full-Term Delivery and Long-Term Offspring Morbidity in Low-Risk Pregnancies: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Trajectories of childbirth-related posttraumatic stress symptoms after a vaginal delivery: a multicenter prospective study.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Early life adversity and polycystic ovary syndrome among North American pregnancy planners.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2026
Same journal

Survival assessment of adjuvant chemotherapy for cytology-negative, non-myoinvasive stage IC clear cell endometrial cancer.

American journal of obstetrics and gynecology·2026
See all related articles

Computerized admission forms significantly reduce errors compared to handwritten forms. This study found computerized forms had fewer overall and serious errors, improving patient record accuracy.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Informatics
  • Health Information Management
  • Patient Safety

Background:

  • Standardized admission forms are crucial for accurate patient data collection.
  • Handwritten forms are prone to errors, potentially impacting patient care and administrative processes.
  • Evaluating the accuracy of different data entry methods is essential for healthcare improvement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the accuracy of computer-generated admission forms against standardized handwritten forms.
  • To quantify the types and frequency of errors in both form formats.
  • To determine if computerized admission forms offer superior accuracy in patient record keeping.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative analysis of 40 patient records was conducted.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Accuracy was assessed by comparing computer-generated forms to their handwritten counterparts.
  • Errors were categorized and quantified, including serious errors.

    • Main Results:

    • Handwritten forms averaged 8.3 errors per record.
    • Computerized forms averaged only 0.9 errors per record (p < 0.0001).
    • Handwritten forms had seven serious errors, while computerized forms had only one (p < 0.05).

    Conclusions:

    • Computerized admission forms demonstrate significantly higher accuracy than handwritten forms.
    • The reduction in errors associated with computerized forms can enhance patient safety and data integrity.
    • Adoption of computerized admission systems is recommended for improved healthcare data management.