Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

More reliable outcome measures can reduce sample size requirements

A C Leon1, P M Marzuk, L Portera

  • 1Department of Psychiatry, Cornell University Medical College, New York, NY, USA.

Archives of General Psychiatry
|October 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Improving clinical trial statistical power can be achieved by carefully selecting outcome measures. Enhancing the reliability of outcome scales reduces variability, increases effect size, and lowers sample size requirements, thus decreasing research costs.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Obesity, but not metabolic syndrome, negatively affects outcome in bipolar disorder.

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2015
Same author

Medication adherence in a comparative effectiveness trial for bipolar disorder.

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2013
Same author

Using comparative effectiveness design to improve the generalizability of bipolar treatment trials data: contrasting LiTMUS baseline data with pre-existing placebo controlled trials.

Journal of affective disorders·2013
Same author

General medical burden in bipolar disorder: findings from the LiTMUS comparative effectiveness trial.

Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2013
Same author

Challenges in designing comparative-effectiveness trials for antidepressants.

Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics·2012
Same author

Do risk factors for suicidal behavior differ by affective disorder polarity?

Psychological medicine·2008

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Psychometrics
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Statistical power in clinical trials typically focuses on sample size.
  • The impact of outcome measure selection on statistical power is often overlooked.
  • Reliability and validity are critical psychometric properties of outcome measures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To empirically investigate the relationship between the reliability of an outcome measure and statistical power.
  • To demonstrate how enhancing outcome scale reliability can influence statistical power and reduce sample size requirements.

Main Methods:

  • Exploration of the relationship between the number of items in an outcome scale and its internal consistency reliability.
  • Empirical analysis of how changes in reliability affect within-group variability and between-group effect size.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Increasing the number of related items in an outcome scale enhances internal consistency reliability.
  • Higher reliability leads to decreased within-group variability.
  • Decreased variability results in increased between-group effect size and reduced sample size needs.

Conclusions:

  • Careful selection and psychometric evaluation of outcome measures can significantly improve statistical power.
  • Optimizing outcome measure reliability offers a viable strategy to decrease sample size and research costs in clinical trials.
  • Psychometric properties should be a primary consideration during the clinical trial design phase, alongside sample size determination.