Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A simple analysis of crossover studies with one-group interaction

T J Cleophas1

  • 1Department of Medicine, Merwede Hospital, Sliedrecht-Dordrecht, Netherlands.

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics
|June 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a more powerful simplified analysis for crossover trials with a one-sided carryover effect. This method improves upon standard analyses, addressing limitations that have led to discouragement of crossover designs in clinical research.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessment of quality of life in patients with angina pectoris: Progress made by the Dutch Mononitrate Quality-Of-Life (DUMQOL) Study Group.

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation·2015
Same author

Quality of life with heart failure: psychosocial determinants to be considered by cardiologists.

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation·2015
Same author

How to manage the symptomatic patient with atrial fibrillation: Munich, 30 August 2004.

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation·2015
Same author

Cell therapy - the genie is out of the tissue culture bottle: Munich, 30 August 2004.

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation·2015
Same author

Genetic polymorphisms and endothelial dysfunction in patients with essential hypertension: a cross-sectional case-control study.

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation·2015
Same author

Quality of life of patients on the waiting list for coronary angiography.

Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation·2015

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Biostatistics
  • Medical Research Methodology

Background:

  • Crossover trials offer intuitive patient-as-own-control designs, eliminating between-subject variability.
  • However, these designs are susceptible to treatment-by-period interaction bias, specifically carryover effects.
  • The standard Hills-Armitage analysis for interaction has limited statistical power, leading to reduced use of crossover trials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the common clinical scenario of a one-sided carryover effect in crossover trials.
  • To present a simplified and more powerful statistical analysis for this specific interaction bias.
  • To offer an alternative to the standard analysis that has been criticized for low power.

Main Methods:

  • The study focuses on a simplified analysis tailored for crossover trials exhibiting carryover effects in only one treatment group.

Related Experiment Videos

  • This approach is contrasted with the standard Hills-Armitage analysis concerning statistical power.
  • The methodology aims to provide a more robust assessment when interaction bias is present in a specific pattern.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed simplified analysis demonstrates greater statistical power compared to the standard Hills-Armitage analysis for the targeted scenario.
    • This enhanced power allows for more reliable detection of treatment effects in the presence of one-sided carryover.
    • The findings suggest a viable alternative for analyzing crossover trials with this common bias.

    Conclusions:

    • The simplified analysis offers a statistically superior method for handling one-sided carryover effects in crossover trials.
    • This approach can help overcome the limitations that have led to the discouragement of crossover designs.
    • It provides clinicians and statisticians with a more powerful tool for robust clinical trial analysis.