Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Psychiatric kibitzing

M A Houghton1

  • 1Medical College of Wisconsin, USA.

Psychiatric Services (Washington, D.C.)
|August 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Clinician reviewers must understand cases to avoid negatively impacting patient treatment. Critiquing other clinicians

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Letters.

The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
Same author

Parenterally transmitted non-A, non-B hepatitis: virus-specific antibody response patterns in hepatitis C virus-infected chimpanzees.

Gastroenterology·1990
Same author

Allospecific T cell recognition of HLA-A2 antigens: evidence for group-specific and subgroup-specific epitopes.

Immunogenetics·1985
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical ethics
  • Clinical practice

Background:

  • Managed care and utilization review raise concerns about cost-effectiveness in healthcare.
  • Decisions impacting patient treatment are increasingly influenced by external reviews.

Observation:

  • A clinician-reviewer with limited case knowledge may make critical treatment decisions.
  • Dr. Houghton's essay highlights the risks of external criticism of clinical judgment.

Findings:

  • External reviews, even without direct managed care involvement, can pose risks.
  • The essay underscores the importance of thorough understanding before critiquing clinical work.

Implications:

  • Ensuring reviewer expertise is crucial for patient safety and effective care.
  • Promoting collegial review and mutual understanding among clinicians is vital.