Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Accreditation of postdoctoral general dentistry programs

P Glassman1

  • 1Department of Dental Practice, Advanced Education Program in General Dentistry, University of the Pacific School of Dentistry, San Francisco, California 94115, USA.

The Journal of the American College of Dentists
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Assessment of objectives of post-doctoral general dentistry programs in Canada.

Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry·2001
Same author

Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality.

JAMA·2001
Same author

How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A prospective comparison of standardized patients with the medical record.

The American journal of medicine·2000
Same author

Management of malnutrition in the elderly and the appropriate use of commercially manufactured oral nutritional supplements.

The journal of nutrition, health & aging·2000
Same author

Improving oral health for people with special needs through community-based dental care delivery systems.

Journal of the California Dental Association·1999
Same author

Accreditation issues in post-doctoral general dentistry programs.

Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry·1999
Same journal

Cuba City Family Dental.

The Journal of the American College of Dentists·2018
Same journal

Century College.

The Journal of the American College of Dentists·2018
Same journal

Oak Park Dental Group.

The Journal of the American College of Dentists·2018
Same journal

Northridge Dental Group.

The Journal of the American College of Dentists·2018
Same journal

Family HealthCare.

The Journal of the American College of Dentists·2018
Same journal

The Practice of Dr. Edward Denholm.

The Journal of the American College of Dentists·2018
See all related articles

Accreditation models for genetic diagnostic programs need innovation to meet rising demand. Current systems struggle with program diversity and create confusion, necessitating a shift towards competency-based education.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Education
  • Genetics
  • Healthcare Workforce Development

Background:

  • Increasing demand for genetic diagnostic programs necessitates scalable accreditation.
  • Current accreditation models are historically rooted and do not reflect program diversity.
  • Workforce pressures create challenges for program directors and applicants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the need for innovative accreditation models for genetic diagnostic programs.
  • To address the limitations of the current accreditation system.
  • To explore the adoption of competency-based education.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of current accreditation challenges.
  • Review of historical and political factors influencing accreditation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of the trend towards competency-based education.
  • Main Results:

    • Current accreditation struggles to accommodate diverse genetic diagnostic programs.
    • Existing systems create administrative burdens and applicant confusion.
    • A competency-based approach offers a promising alternative.

    Conclusions:

    • Innovative accreditation is crucial for expanding genetic diagnostic training.
    • A competency-based model aligns with modern educational trends and addresses current system flaws.
    • Reforming accreditation will improve training accessibility and workforce readiness.