Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Internal Receptors01:31

Internal Receptors

Many cellular signals are hydrophilic and therefore cannot pass through the plasma membrane. However, small or hydrophobic signaling molecules can cross the hydrophobic core of the plasma membrane and bind to internal, or intracellular, receptors that reside within the cell. Many mammalian steroid hormones use this mechanism of cell signaling, as does nitric oxide (NO) gas.
Types of Receptors: Internal Receptors01:07

Types of Receptors: Internal Receptors

Many cellular signals are hydrophilic and cannot pass through the plasma membrane. However, small or hydrophobic signaling molecules can cross the hydrophobic core of the plasma membrane and bind intracellular receptors that reside within the cell cytoplasm or nucleus. Many mammalian steroid hormones and nitric oxide (NO) gas use this cell signaling mechanism.
Similar to membrane-bound receptors, the binding of a ligand to the intracellular receptor of causes a conformational change in the...
Assembly of Signaling Complexes01:30

Assembly of Signaling Complexes

Multiprotein signaling complexes are formed in a dynamic process involving protein-protein interactions at the cytoplasmic domain of transmembrane receptors or enzymatic and non-enzymatic proteins associated with the receptor. These complexes ensure the activation and propagation of intracellular signals that regulate cell functions.
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
Cell Signaling in Plants01:25

Cell Signaling in Plants

Plant cells communicate to coordinate their cycle of growth, flowering and fruiting, and activities in roots, shoots, and leaves in response to the changing environmental conditions. Plant signaling is distinct from animal signaling. Plants primarily utilize enzyme-linked receptors, whereas the largest class of cell-surface receptors in animals are G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Unlike animals, receptor tyrosine kinases are rare in plants. Instead, plants have a diverse class of...
G Protein-coupled Receptors01:15

G Protein-coupled Receptors

G Protein-Coupled Receptors or GPCRs are membrane-bound receptors that transiently associate with heterotrimeric G proteins and induce an appropriate response to sensory stimuli such as light, odors, hormones, cytokines, or neurotransmitters.
GPCRs are also called heptahelical, 7TM, or serpentine receptors, and consist of seven (H1-H7) transmembrane alpha-helices that span the bilayer to form a cylindrical core. The transmembrane helices are connected by three extracellular loops and three...
Transducer Mechanism: Nuclear Receptors01:31

Transducer Mechanism: Nuclear Receptors

Nuclear receptors, or NRs, are unique transcription factors that regulate gene transcription and affect the cellular pathways involved in reproduction, development, or metabolism. Their ability to be stimulated by small lipophilic ligands and control vital cellular processes makes them ideal drug targets. Nearly 10-15% of currently prescribed drugs target these receptors.
About 48 different soluble family members of nuclear receptors are identified that can be divided into two main classes:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Aryl hydrocarbon nuclear translocator (hypoxia inducible factor 1beta) activity is required more during early than late tumor growth.

Molecular carcinogenesis·2009
Same author

Identification of novel dioxin-responsive genes by representational difference analysis.

Xenobiotica; the fate of foreign compounds in biological systems·2007
Same author

Identification of genes differentially induced by hypoxia in pancreatic cancer cells.

Biochemical and biophysical research communications·2001
Same author

CYP1A1 levels in lung tissue of tobacco smokers and polymorphisms of CYP1A1 and aromatic hydrocarbon receptor.

Pharmacogenetics·2001
Same author

Loss of cyp1a1 messenger rna expression due to nonsense-mediated decay.

Molecular pharmacology·2001
Same author

Induction and regulation of the carcinogen-metabolizing enzyme CYP1A1 by marijuana smoke and delta (9)-tetrahydrocannabinol.

American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology·2001

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Reverse Yeast Two-hybrid System to Identify Mammalian Nuclear Receptor Residues that Interact with Ligands and/or Antagonists
10:51

Reverse Yeast Two-hybrid System to Identify Mammalian Nuclear Receptor Residues that Interact with Ligands and/or Antagonists

Published on: November 16, 2013

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex

O Hankinson1

  • 1Department of Pathology, University of California, Los Angeles 90024, USA.

Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

This study explores how the aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex (AHRC) responds to certain environmental chemicals. When a ligand binds to the AHRC, it changes structure and activates specific genes. These genes help break down pollutants like polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) into harmful forms. However, halogenated aromatic hydrocarbons (HAHs) cause damage without needing to be metabolized. The study also suggests that the AHRC may send signals without directly interacting with DNA. Researchers are now looking into how this complex affects development and gene regulation. Understanding these processes could help explain how environmental toxins impact health.

Keywords:
aryl hydrocarbon receptorxenobiotic responsegene regulationenvironmental toxicology

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Prediction and Validation of Gene Regulatory Elements Activated During Retinoic Acid Induced Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation
09:07

Prediction and Validation of Gene Regulatory Elements Activated During Retinoic Acid Induced Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation

Published on: June 21, 2016

Optimizing the Genetic Incorporation of Chemical Probes into GPCRs for Photo-crosslinking Mapping and Bioorthogonal Chemistry in Live Mammalian Cells
14:02

Optimizing the Genetic Incorporation of Chemical Probes into GPCRs for Photo-crosslinking Mapping and Bioorthogonal Chemistry in Live Mammalian Cells

Published on: April 9, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 11, 2026

Reverse Yeast Two-hybrid System to Identify Mammalian Nuclear Receptor Residues that Interact with Ligands and/or Antagonists
10:51

Reverse Yeast Two-hybrid System to Identify Mammalian Nuclear Receptor Residues that Interact with Ligands and/or Antagonists

Published on: November 16, 2013

Prediction and Validation of Gene Regulatory Elements Activated During Retinoic Acid Induced Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation
09:07

Prediction and Validation of Gene Regulatory Elements Activated During Retinoic Acid Induced Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation

Published on: June 21, 2016

Optimizing the Genetic Incorporation of Chemical Probes into GPCRs for Photo-crosslinking Mapping and Bioorthogonal Chemistry in Live Mammalian Cells
14:02

Optimizing the Genetic Incorporation of Chemical Probes into GPCRs for Photo-crosslinking Mapping and Bioorthogonal Chemistry in Live Mammalian Cells

Published on: April 9, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Molecular biology of signaling pathways
  • Environmental toxicology and receptor function
  • Transcriptional regulation in gene expression

Background:

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex (AHRC) has long been recognized for its role in responding to environmental pollutants. Prior research has shown that this complex is involved in gene regulation, particularly in response to aromatic hydrocarbons. However, the precise mechanisms by which the AHRC functions remain partially unclear. Some studies have explored the interaction between AHR and ARNT, but the full extent of their roles is still under investigation. The distinction between ligand-bound and unliganded states of the AHRC is not fully understood. Researchers have noted that the complex can initiate transcription of specific genes when activated. The connection between AHRC activity and the metabolic activation of pollutants is a key area of interest. This uncertainty has driven recent studies to better define the AHRC’s function and its implications in toxicology and development.

Purpose Of The Study:

This study aims to clarify the functional dynamics of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex (AHRC) in response to different ligands. The specific problem centers on understanding how the AHRC transitions from an unliganded to a ligand-bound state. The motivation stems from the need to better understand the mechanisms of gene regulation and toxicological responses. The study also seeks to determine whether the AHR can act independently of DNA binding. Researchers are interested in the role of the AHRC in the development of certain biological processes. The study also investigates the pathways through which HAHs exert their effects. The goal is to explore whether the AHRC contributes to transcriptional activation in ways beyond gene expression. This work may help clarify the AHRC’s role in both environmental and developmental contexts.

Main Methods:

The study employs biochemical and molecular techniques to examine the structure and function of the AHRC. Researchers use ligand-binding assays to observe how PAH and HAH interact with the receptor complex. They also analyze the interaction between AHR and ARNT using co-immunoprecipitation methods. Transcriptional activity is assessed through reporter gene assays. The researchers investigate whether AHR can function without DNA binding by using mutagenesis techniques. They also track the expression of responsive genes using RNA sequencing. Computational modeling is used to predict the conformational changes in the AHRC. The study integrates these methods to provide a comprehensive view of the AHRC’s behavior.

Main Results:

The study finds that the AHRC undergoes a structural change upon ligand binding. This transformation leads to the release of AHR from the complex. The AHR then binds with ARNT to form a heterodimeric complex. This transformed complex binds to xenobiotic responsive elements in DNA. The binding activates the transcription of specific genes. Some of these genes encode enzymes that metabolize PAHs into mutagenic forms. HAHs do not require metabolic activation to cause toxicity. Instead, their effects depend directly on the AHRC. The study also shows that AHR may mediate signaling without DNA binding. These findings suggest multiple pathways for AHRC activity.

Conclusions:

The authors suggest that the AHRC plays a central role in mediating the effects of aromatic hydrocarbons. They propose that the transformed complex is essential for gene activation. The study indicates that HAH toxicity does not rely on metabolic activation. Instead, the AHRC itself may drive pathogenic effects. The researchers suggest that AHR may function in signal transduction independently of DNA. They also highlight the need to understand the full range of AHRC activities. The study supports further investigation into the developmental roles of AHR and ARNT. These conclusions align with the observed structural and functional changes in the complex.

The AHRC activates transcription of genes in response to aromatic hydrocarbons by binding to xenobiotic responsive elements.

Ligand binding causes the release of AHR, which then forms a heterodimer with ARNT to create the transformed AHRC.

The study suggests that AHR may mediate signaling independently of DNA binding, though this mechanism is not fully understood.

HAHs cause toxicity through the AHRC without requiring metabolic activation to mutagenic forms.

The transformed AHRC activates genes encoding enzymes that metabolize PAHs into mutagenic derivatives.

The authors suggest investigating the developmental roles of AHR and ARNT and the mechanisms of transcriptional activation.