Related Experiment Videos
Repeatability of the Glaucoma Hemifield Test in automated perimetry
J Katz1, H A Quigley, A Sommer
1Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins University, School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205-2103, USA.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
|July 1, 1995
Summary
Consecutive visual field tests show some agreement for glaucoma diagnosis. Using two tests improves specificity in clinical trials, though it may slightly reduce sensitivity.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Visual field testing
- Glaucoma diagnostics
Background:
- Automated visual field testing is crucial for glaucoma detection.
- The Glaucoma Hemifield Test (GHT) is a common screening tool.
- Assessing test-retest variability is important for clinical trial design.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the concordance of the Glaucoma Hemifield Test and other visual field indices between two consecutive Humphrey Field Analyzer tests.
- To determine the impact of using two tests on specificity and sensitivity for clinical trial enrollment.
Main Methods:
- Two automated visual field tests were performed on normal subjects, ocular hypertensive subjects, and glaucoma patients.
- The Glaucoma Hemifield Test, mean deviation, and corrected pattern standard deviation were compared between consecutive tests.
- Test-retest intervals varied from 1 to 2 years for normal subjects and 1 year for others.
Main Results:
- The proportion of normal subjects meeting abnormality criteria on two tests was 2.4%, and 10.5% of glaucoma subjects had normal results on two tests.
- Requiring two abnormal tests increased specificity for glaucoma trials from 80.8% to 89.9%.
- Requiring two normal tests increased specificity for ocular hypertension trials from 84.2% to 89.5%.
Conclusions:
- While consecutive Glaucoma Hemifield Test results show concordance, some disagreement exists.
- Employing a second visual field test enhances specificity in clinical trial settings.
- This approach offers improved diagnostic accuracy for patient selection in trials.