Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Recognition memory for exceptions to the category rule

T J Palmeri1, R M Nosofsky

  • 1Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington 47405, USA.

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition
|May 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Learning to classify integral-dimension stimuli.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2013
Same author

Dynamics of saccade target selection: race model analysis of double step and search step saccade production in human and macaque.

Vision research·2007
Same author

A single-system interpretation of dissociations between recognition and categorization in a task involving object-like stimuli.

Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience·2002
Same author

Learning categories at different hierarchical levels: a comparison of category learning models.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Category variability, exemplar similarity, and perceptual classification.

Memory & cognition·2002
Same author

Exemplar accounts of blending and distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2001
Same journal

Testing the predictions of a distinctiveness model of memory: The production effect in backward recall.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

On the impact of adjacency on transposed-word effects under serial presentation.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

It's time to opt out: Metacognitive analysis of time regulation under uncertainty.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

The role of statistical learning in attentional guidance during search through naturalistic scenes.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same journal

Crossmodal correspondences influence adaptation during rule-based category learning of objects.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
See all related articles

This study shows that people better remember exceptions to category rules, suggesting a rule-plus-exception model improves understanding of memory and categorization.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Memory Studies
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Current models of categorization and recognition memory primarily focus on exemplar-based views.
  • There is a need to extend these models to account for how exceptions to rules are processed and stored in memory.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the utility of a rule-plus-exception model in explaining categorization and recognition memory.
  • To determine if exceptions to category rules hold a special status in memory.
  • To compare the predictive power of a rule-plus-exception model against traditional exemplar-based approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Four experiments were conducted involving participants learning to categorize items into two ill-defined categories.
  • Participants made old-new recognition judgments after learning category rules and exceptions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data were analyzed using a mixed model combining rule-plus-exception processing and exemplar storage.

    • Main Results:

    • Participants demonstrated superior recognition memory for exemplars that were exceptions to imperfect category rules.
    • Memory for old exemplars was significantly better than for new exemplars.
    • The proposed mixed model provided a strong quantitative fit to the experimental data.

    Conclusions:

    • The rule-plus-exception model effectively extends exemplar-based views of categorization and recognition memory.
    • Exceptions to category rules are uniquely salient and better retained in memory.
    • A combination of rule-based processing with exception handling and residual exemplar storage best explains human memory performance in categorization tasks.