The Gross Motor Performance Measure: validity and responsiveness of a measure of quality of movement

W F Boyce1, C Gowland, P L Rosenbaum

  • 1School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

Physical Therapy
|July 1, 1995
PubMed

Insights

This study validated a gross motor performance measure for children with cerebral palsy (CP). The tool effectively detected changes in movement quality, distinguishing between stable and responsive patient groups.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric rehabilitation
  • Movement science
  • Clinical assessment tools

Background:

  • Cerebral palsy (CP) significantly impacts gross motor function in children.
  • Accurate assessment tools are crucial for tracking treatment efficacy.
  • Existing measures may not fully capture subtle changes in movement quality.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate a gross motor performance measure for children aged 0-12 years with cerebral palsy.
  • To assess the measure's sensitivity in detecting changes in movement quality over time.
  • To evaluate the measure's utility in differentiating patient response to interventions.

Main Methods:

  • Longitudinal study involving 106 children with cerebral palsy, 18 with head injuries, and 29 controls.
  • Physical therapists administered the measure on two occasions, 4-6 months apart.
  • Validity was assessed by comparing measure changes across diagnostic groups, severity levels, and age brackets.

Main Results:

  • The gross motor performance measure demonstrated supported a priori hypotheses regarding its validity.
  • The measure showed differential responsiveness to changes in "stable" and "responsive" patient groups.
  • Relationships between the measure and parent/therapist ratings were not clearly established.

Conclusions:

  • The validated gross motor performance measure is a sensitive tool for assessing children with cerebral palsy.
  • The measure can distinguish between children with different prognoses or treatment responses.
  • Further research may be needed to correlate findings with subjective clinical ratings.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos