Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparison of methods for detecting keratoconus using videokeratography

N Maeda1, S D Klyce, M K Smolek

  • 1Lions Eye Research Laboratories, Louisiana State University, Medical Center School of Medicine, New Orleans, USA.

Archives of Ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)
|July 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

An expert system classifier demonstrated superior accuracy in detecting keratoconus using videokeratography compared to keratometry and the Rabinowitz-McDonnell test. This advanced method offers improved sensitivity and specificity for clinical applications.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Contribution of the ocular surface to visual optics.

Experimental eye research·2004
Same author

Screening of prior refractive surgery by a wavelet-based neural network.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2001
Same author

Is keratoconus a true ectasia? An evaluation of corneal surface area.

Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960)·2000
Same author

Anomalous acute inflammatory response in rabbit corneal stroma.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2000
Same author

Keratoconus detection with the KISA% method-another view.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2000
Same author

Corneal hydration and central islands after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·1998

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Medical Imaging
  • Corneal Topography

Background:

  • Accurate detection of keratoconus patterns via videokeratography is crucial for refractive surgery screening.
  • Understanding the genetic basis of keratoconus relies on precise diagnostic methods.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of three quantitative videokeratography analysis methods for keratoconus detection.
  • To evaluate the limitations, capabilities, and clinical suitability of each method.

Main Methods:

  • Compared keratometry, the modified Rabinowitz-McDonnell test, and an expert system classifier.
  • Utilized videokeratographs from 44 keratoconus and 132 non-keratoconus cases.
  • Calculated sensitivity and specificity for each detection method.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Expert system classifier achieved 98% sensitivity and 99% specificity.
  • Modified Rabinowitz-McDonnell test showed 96% sensitivity and 85% specificity.
  • Keratometry yielded 84% sensitivity and 86% specificity.

Conclusions:

  • The expert system classifier is highly suitable for diagnosing keratoconus due to its superior specificity.
  • Both the modified Rabinowitz-McDonnell test and the expert system classifier are appropriate for refractive surgery screening, prioritizing sensitivity.