Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Alternative approaches to population structure

N E Morton1

  • 1Human Genetics Centre, University of Southampton, UK.

Genetica
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Closely linked cis-acting modifier of expansion of the CGG repeat in high risk FMR1 haplotypes.

Human mutation·2007
Same author

Refined association mapping for a quantitative trait: weight in the H19-IGF2-INS-TH region.

Annals of human genetics·2006
Same author

An investigation of FRAXA intermediate allele phenotype in a longitudinal sample.

Annals of human genetics·2006
Same author

A map of the human genome in linkage disequilibrium units.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2005
Same author

The optimal measure of linkage disequilibrium reduces error in association mapping of affection status.

Human molecular genetics·2004
Same author

A metric linkage disequilibrium map of a human chromosome.

Annals of human genetics·2003
Same journal

Morphological and COI-based identification of species of the Hawkmoth genus Theretra Hübner, 1819 (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) from Himachal Pradesh, India.

Genetica·2026
Same journal

Advancing genetics and evolution: new Editors-in-Chief in Genetica.

Genetica·2026
Same journal

Origin and diversification of Altai osmans (Oreoleuciscus), Far Eastern phoxinin minnows (Rhynchocypris) and Far Eastern redfins (Tribolodon) of the Leuciscidae family (Actinopterygii): an example of evolutionary tempo variation?

Genetica·2026
Same journal

Chloroplast genome comparison, phylogeny, and molecular evolution of five endemic Potentilla (Rosaceae) species in Mongolia.

Genetica·2026
Same journal

Severe trauma and chronic stress: seeds and fruits of epigenetic sensitivity.

Genetica·2026
Same journal

Molecular evolution and antigenic mapping of classical swine fever virus: a comprehensive analysis of E2 genomic variability and selection dynamics.

Genetica·2026
See all related articles

This study evaluates three DNA identification methods: tectonic, halieutic, and icarian. The tectonic approach is deemed sensible, while halieutic is impractical and icarian is idiotic.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Genetics
  • Biotechnology

Background:

  • DNA identification is crucial in forensics and other scientific fields.
  • Various methodologies exist for DNA analysis, each with inherent strengths and weaknesses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically analyze and compare three distinct DNA identification approaches: tectonic, halieutic, and icarian.
  • To detail the underlying rationale and potential consequences associated with each method.

Main Methods:

  • A theoretical framework is established to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of each DNA identification approach.
  • The study involves a detailed examination of the logical underpinnings and practical implications of the tectonic, halieutic, and icarian methods.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The tectonic approach to DNA identification is presented as a sensible and viable method.
  • The halieutic approach is found to be impractical for widespread DNA identification.
  • The icarian approach is critically assessed and deemed an idiotic strategy for DNA identification.

Conclusions:

  • The tectonic method offers a rational and effective strategy for DNA identification.
  • The halieutic and icarian methods present significant limitations, rendering them unsuitable for practical application in DNA identification.