Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

DNA evidence: wrong answers or wrong questions?

B Robertson1, G A Vignaux

  • 1Department of Business Law, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

Genetica
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Longitudinal studies on interdisciplinary teaching models incorporating plastic surgery.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2025
Same author

Mycobacterial lipoarabinomannan negatively interferes with macrophage responses to <i>Aspergillus fumigatus in-vitro</i>.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same author

A retrospective study of tuberculosis outcomes in Gulf Province, Papua New Guinea.

Public health action·2019
Same author

Nodal disease predicts recurrence whereas other traditional factors affect survival in a cohort of South African patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma.

Cancers of the head & neck·2019
Same author

Catastrophic drug errors involving tranexamic acid administered during spinal anaesthesia.

Anaesthesia·2019
Same author

Requiem for Nigro or is anal squamous carcinoma still a surgical problem: Abdominoperineal excision rather than a defunctioning stoma?

South African journal of surgery. Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir chirurgie·2018
Same journal

Morphological and COI-based identification of species of the Hawkmoth genus Theretra Hübner, 1819 (Lepidoptera: Sphingidae) from Himachal Pradesh, India.

Genetica·2026
Same journal

Advancing genetics and evolution: new Editors-in-Chief in Genetica.

Genetica·2026
Same journal

Origin and diversification of Altai osmans (Oreoleuciscus), Far Eastern phoxinin minnows (Rhynchocypris) and Far Eastern redfins (Tribolodon) of the Leuciscidae family (Actinopterygii): an example of evolutionary tempo variation?

Genetica·2026
Same journal

Chloroplast genome comparison, phylogeny, and molecular evolution of five endemic Potentilla (Rosaceae) species in Mongolia.

Genetica·2026
Same journal

Severe trauma and chronic stress: seeds and fruits of epigenetic sensitivity.

Genetica·2026
Same journal

Molecular evolution and antigenic mapping of classical swine fever virus: a comprehensive analysis of E2 genomic variability and selection dynamics.

Genetica·2026
See all related articles

Forensic DNA evidence presentation can be controversial. Using likelihood ratios, instead of traditional matching, better addresses court questions and guides future DNA research.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Genetics
  • Legal Evidence

Background:

  • Classical presentation of forensic DNA evidence relies on matching samples to a criterion.
  • This traditional method often fails to answer key legal questions and hinders scientific advancement.
  • Controversy surrounding DNA evidence stems from its conventional presentation in legal proceedings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the limitations of the orthodox approach in presenting DNA evidence.
  • To advocate for the adoption of likelihood ratios in forensic science.
  • To highlight how likelihood ratios can improve the clarity and relevance of expert testimony.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of traditional DNA evidence presentation versus likelihood ratio approach.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Examination of how each method addresses legal inquiries.
  • Identification of research avenues stimulated by each presentation method.

    • Main Results:

    • The orthodox method of DNA evidence presentation is inadequate for court proceedings.
    • Likelihood ratios directly address the questions posed by the court.
    • The likelihood ratio approach clarifies necessary research for advancing forensic DNA understanding.

    Conclusions:

    • Shifting from traditional matching to likelihood ratios enhances the utility of DNA evidence in legal contexts.
    • Likelihood ratios provide a more scientifically sound and legally relevant framework for presenting forensic findings.
    • This approach promotes targeted research, improving the overall understanding and application of DNA evidence.