Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Individual differences in simultaneous masking with random-frequency, multicomponent maskers

D L Neff1, T M Dethlefs

  • 1Boys Town National Research Hospital, Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|July 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intensity discrimination in the presence of random-frequency, multicomponent maskers and broadband noise.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1996
Same author

Sex differences in simultaneous masking with random-frequency maskers.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1996
Same author

Signal properties that reduce masking by simultaneous, random-frequency maskers.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1995
Same author

The social construction of infertility: the case of the matrilineal Nayars in south India.

Social science & medicine (1982)·1994
Same author

Informational masking for multicomponent maskers with spectral gaps.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1993
Same author

Forward masking by maskers of uncertain frequency content.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1991
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Large individual differences in auditory masking thresholds were observed, challenging current models. Performance varied significantly with masker complexity and uncertainty, but training showed limited effects on established thresholds.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal processing

Background:

  • Auditory masking is fundamental to understanding speech perception and hearing.
  • Individual variability in auditory masking poses challenges for predictive models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate individual differences in simultaneous auditory masking.
  • To examine the impact of masker complexity and uncertainty on masking thresholds.

Main Methods:

  • Simultaneous-masking task using a 1000-Hz signal.
  • Random-frequency, multicomponent sinusoidal maskers and broadband noise maskers.
  • Analysis of listener thresholds across varying masker component numbers and uncertainty levels.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Masking thresholds varied up to 59 dB across listeners.
  • Listener performance differed based on masker component number, with some groups showing improvement and others showing decrements.
  • Reduced masker uncertainty and temporal differences significantly improved performance.

Conclusions:

  • Significant individual differences in auditory masking thresholds exist.
  • Masker frequency uncertainty is a critical factor influencing masking.
  • Current models may need refinement to account for substantial listener variability.