Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Mouse Models of Cancer Study

Mouse Models of Cancer Study

Mice have long served as models for studying human biology and pathology because of their phylogenetic and physiological similarity with humans. They are also easy to maintain and breed in the laboratory, and hence, many inbred strains are now available for research. Studies on mice have contributed immeasurably to our understanding of cancer biology.
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Simulating the methodological bias in the ATLS classification of hypovolemic shock: a critical reappraisal of the base deficit renaissance.

Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine·2024

Same author

Decision analysis in the clinical neurosciences: a systematic review of the literature.

European journal of neurology·2013

Same author

Chapter 7: Description of MISCAN-lung, the Erasmus MC Lung Cancer microsimulation model for evaluating cancer control interventions.

Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2012

Same author

Diagnosis of motor fascicle compression in carpal tunnel syndrome.

Orthopaedics & traumatology, surgery & research : OTSR·2010

Same author

Meta-analysis of age-prevalence patterns in lymphatic filariasis: no decline in microfilaraemia prevalence in older age groups as predicted by models with acquired immunity.

Parasitology·2004

Same author

Vector survival and parasite infection: the effect of Wuchereria bancrofti on its vector Culex quinquefasciatus.

Parasitology·2004

Same journal

Modeling treatment effects on absorbing outcomes in clinical trials: Leveraging longitudinal and ordinal data for efficiency gains.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026

Same journal

A joint model for a longitudinal outcome and a progressive multistate model under a mixed observation scheme.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026

Same journal

Efficient semi-supervised estimation of optimal individualized treatment regimes with survival outcome.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026

Same journal

Asymptotic online FWER control for dependent test statistics.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026

Same journal

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026

Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 6, 2026

Modeling Breast Cancer in Human Breast Tissue using a Microphysiological System

Modeling Breast Cancer in Human Breast Tissue using a Microphysiological System

Published on: April 23, 2021

Modelling issues in cancer screening

G J van Oortmarssen¹, R Boer, J D Habbema

¹Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

Statistical Methods in Medical Research

|March 1, 1995

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Cancer screening models aid data analysis and evaluation, predicting effects and cost-effectiveness. Differences in models for cervical and breast cancer highlight areas for improvement in early detection and prognosis.

More Related Videos

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

A Minimally Invasive Method for Generating a Syngeneic Orthotopic Mouse Model of Lung Cancer

A Minimally Invasive Method for Generating a Syngeneic Orthotopic Mouse Model of Lung Cancer

Published on: August 19, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 6, 2026

Modeling Breast Cancer in Human Breast Tissue using a Microphysiological System

Modeling Breast Cancer in Human Breast Tissue using a Microphysiological System

Published on: April 23, 2021

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

A Minimally Invasive Method for Generating a Syngeneic Orthotopic Mouse Model of Lung Cancer

A Minimally Invasive Method for Generating a Syngeneic Orthotopic Mouse Model of Lung Cancer

Published on: August 19, 2025

Area of Science:

Epidemiology
Biostatistics
Health Economics

Background:

Cancer screening models are crucial for analyzing data and evaluating program effectiveness.
Key applications include hypothesis testing for preclinical disease and assessing the link between early detection and cancer mortality.
Simulation models are vital for predicting screening impacts, cost-effectiveness, and optimizing screening intervals and age ranges.

Purpose of the Study:

To compare and contrast modeling approaches for cervical and breast cancer screening.
To identify current challenges and future directions in cancer screening modeling.
To emphasize the influence of data quality and subclassification on model outcomes.

Main Methods:

Utilized analytical-numerical statistical models for hypothesis testing.
Employed simulation models for prediction of screening effects and cost-effectiveness.
Reviewed existing literature and identified key differences between cervical and breast cancer screening models.

Main Results:

Significant differences exist in models for cervical and breast cancer screening.
Cervical cancer models grapple with lesion progression/regression and incidence/mortality impacts.
Breast cancer models show a weaker link between early detection and improved prognosis, despite demonstrated mortality reduction.

Conclusions:

Model-based predictions are essential for cancer screening evaluation and optimization.
Addressing data limitations and refining prognostic associations are critical for enhancing model accuracy.
Emerging areas include HPV-based cervical screening, colorectal cancer models, and meta-analysis of screening trials.