Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Binocular disparity processing with opposite-contrast stimuli

A I Cogan1, L L Kontsevich, A J Lomakin

  • 1Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, CA 94114, USA.

Perception
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is there a difference in pressures and forces under the roller with different pads when lunging horses with the Pessoa training aid?

Journal of equine veterinary science·2026
Same author

Use of a spot-check protocol to measure ventricular response rate in dogs with atrial fibrillation.

Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology·2025
Same author

Use of the subcostal view for obtaining aortic spectral Doppler-derived outflow velocities in cats.

Journal of veterinary cardiology : the official journal of the European Society of Veterinary Cardiology·2025
Same author

Tight nosebands apply high pressures on the horses' face and alter stride kinematics.

Journal of equine veterinary science·2025
Same author

The nucleus acts as a ruler tailoring cell responses to spatial constraints.

Science (New York, N.Y.)·2020
Same author

Sustained perceptual invisibility of solid shapes following contour adaptation to partial outlines.

Consciousness and cognition·2014

Stereoscopic depth perception using reversed-contrast images is significantly worse than with matched-contrast images. The exact mechanism for this opposite-contrast stereopsis remains unknown, challenging current theories.

Area of Science:

  • Vision Science
  • Perceptual Psychology
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Stereoscopic vision relies on matching binocular image features.
  • Reversed-contrast stereopsis, using images with inverted luminance, presents unique challenges to visual processing.
  • Existing models often assume same-sign contrast matching for depth perception.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively investigate opposite-contrast stereopsis.
  • To test the validity of the 'same-sign hypothesis' in explaining depth perception with reversed-contrast stimuli.
  • To determine the stereoacuity as a function of bar width in reversed-contrast conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Stereoacuity was measured using narrow-band stimuli with varying bar widths.
  • Experiments involved both matched-contrast and reversed-contrast half images.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Perceived depth was measured as a function of disparity, and same-sign components were manipulated within stimuli.

    • Main Results:

    • Stereoacuity for reversed-contrast stimuli was approximately ten times worse than for matched-contrast stimuli.
    • Valid, disparity-dependent depth perception was still possible with reversed-contrast stimuli, even at low spatial frequencies.
    • The 'same-sign hypothesis' could not adequately explain the observed opposite-contrast stereopsis.

    Conclusions:

    • The mechanism underlying opposite-contrast stereopsis is not explained by the interaction of same-sign binocular contrast components.
    • Current theories regarding stereoscopic depth perception need revision to account for reversed-contrast scenarios.
    • Further research is required to elucidate the neural basis of opposite-contrast stereopsis.