Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A clinician's guide to utility measurement

D A Redelmeier1, A S Detsky

  • 1Department of Health Administration, University of Toronto, Canada.

Primary Care
|June 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Berkson's paradox in medical care.

Journal of internal medicine·2015
Same author

Discharge after discharge: predicting surgical site infections after patients leave hospital.

The Journal of hospital infection·2010
Same author

Myocardial infarction associated with recency of immigration to Ontario.

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2010
Same author

Risk of premature stroke in recent immigrants (PRESARIO): population-based matched cohort study.

Neurology·2010
Same author

The health of homeless immigrants.

Journal of epidemiology and community health·2009
Same author

Do you come to work with a respiratory tract infection?

Occupational and environmental medicine·2009

Clinicians can use six questions to evaluate utility analyses and understand patient quality of life. This structured approach helps identify high-quality research, improving decision analysis in healthcare.

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Decision Analysis
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes

Background:

  • Utility analyses are crucial for understanding patient quality of life in healthcare decision-making.
  • Clinicians face challenges in critically appraising the quality of utility measurement studies.
  • A structured approach is needed to efficiently evaluate the relevance and rigor of utility analyses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide clinicians with a structured framework for evaluating utility analyses.
  • To enhance the understanding of patient quality of life within decision analysis.
  • To offer criteria for discerning high-quality research in utility measurement.

Main Methods:

  • Introduction of six key questions to guide the assessment of utility analyses.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a systematic approach for appraising the quality of research on patient utility.
  • Focus on identifying factors that contribute to robust utility measurement.

    • Main Results:

    • The six questions provide a practical method for clinicians to assess utility analyses.
    • The criteria aid in distinguishing between high-quality and low-quality studies.
    • Readers can better appreciate the merits of utility analyses and their role in decision-making.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed six-question framework assists busy clinicians in selectively engaging with utility analyses.
    • This approach facilitates a better understanding of patient quality of life in health economics and decision analysis.
    • Encourages critical appraisal of research to improve the application of utility data in clinical practice.