Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Experiment Videos

Reviewing scientific papers

S McKenzie1

  • 1Queen Elizabeth Hospital, London.

Archives of Disease in Childhood
|June 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Structured reporting guidelines for scientific studies can improve manuscript quality. These reports encourage reviewer engagement and provide constructive feedback, aiding authors in refining their work for publication.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Case series of cutaneous mucormycosis in the setting of Herpesviridae infection.

The British journal of dermatology·2019
Same author

Squeezing water clusters between graphene sheets: energetics, structure, and intermolecular interactions.

Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP·2014
Same author

Effect of rurality on screening for breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing mammography.

Rural and remote health·2014
Same author

Safety and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneously administered recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa).

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2011
Same author

Functional and histological comparison of rat liver preserved in University of Wisconsin solution compared with tissue preserved in a novel solution.

Transplantation proceedings·2010
Same author

An Australian experience of retrievable inferior vena cava filters in patients with increased risk of thromboembolic disease.

International angiology : a journal of the International Union of Angiology·2010
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Area of Science:

  • Scientific communication
  • Research methodology
  • Publication ethics

Background:

  • The necessity for standardized reporting in scientific research is increasingly recognized.
  • Current reporting practices can vary significantly across different study types.
  • Effective communication of research findings is crucial for scientific progress.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose guidelines for structured reports in scientific publications.
  • To enhance the clarity and consistency of research reporting.
  • To facilitate constructive peer review and author revision.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a structured reporting framework applicable to various study designs.
  • Emphasis on clear articulation of methods, background, and reviewer engagement.
  • Incorporation of principles for courteous and helpful feedback.

Main Results:

  • Structured reports can guide reviewers in assessing manuscript components.
  • A standardized approach promotes consistent evaluation of research integrity.
  • Courteous feedback mechanisms aid in manuscript improvement.

Conclusions:

  • Implementing structured reporting guidelines can elevate the quality of scientific publications.
  • Structured reports foster a more productive peer-review process.
  • Adoption of these guidelines supports scientific advancement through clearer communication.

Related Experiment Videos