Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Technical challenges to successful dialyzer reuse

R A Ward1

  • 1Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Ky 40292, USA.

Blood Purification
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pathogens of Anoplura and Mallophaga (lice).

Bulletin of the World Health Organization·2010
Same author

Water processing for hemodialysis. Part I: a historical perspective.

Seminars in dialysis·2009
Same author

Resistance to intercompartmental mass transfer limits beta2-microglobulin removal by post-dilution hemodiafiltration.

Kidney international·2006
Same author

What clinically important advances in understanding and improving dialyzer function have occurred recently?

Seminars in dialysis·2001
Same author

Increasing dialysate flow rate increases dialyzer urea mass transfer-area coefficients during clinical use.

American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation·2001
Same author

Ultrapure dialysate: a desirable and achievable goal for routine hemodialysis.

Seminars in dialysis·2000
Same journal

Peritoneal Glucose Uptake Reduction by Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors in Clinical Peritoneal Dialysis.

Blood purification·2026
Same journal

With the Generalization of AI and Algorithms, Will We Still Need a Nephrologist in the Dialysis Room?

Blood purification·2026
Same journal

Could serum CA125 aid the clinical assessment of volume status of end-stage kidney disease patients treated by peritoneal dialysis patients?

Blood purification·2026
Same journal

From Bench to Bedside: Implications and Interventions for Endotoxin Exposure in Lipopolysaccharide-Induced Apoptosis and Eryptosis.

Blood purification·2026
Same journal

Feasibility Study of a Smartphone App and Web Portal for Remote Monitoring of Chronic Kidney Disease and Peritoneal Dialysis populations: A mixed-method study.

Blood purification·2026
Same journal

Treatment of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Emerging Extracorporeal Therapies.

Blood purification·2026
See all related articles

Dialyzer reuse technology has limitations impacting patient safety. Improved online monitoring and sterile reprocessing are crucial for safe hemodialysis, addressing microbial contamination and ensuring dialyzer performance.

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Infection Control

Background:

  • Dialyzer reuse technology presents limitations that may lead to adverse patient outcomes.
  • Current methods for assessing dialyzer performance, such as total cell volume, may not be universally valid across all membranes and reprocessing techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To highlight the limitations of current dialyzer reuse technology.
  • To emphasize the need for superior on-line systems for dialyzer performance assessment.
  • To address deficiencies in microbial contamination control and advocate for technological advancements in dialyzer reprocessing.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing dialyzer reuse technologies and their limitations.
  • Analysis of current methods for assessing dialyzer performance.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of microbial contamination standards and water treatment systems in dialyzer reprocessing.

    • Main Results:

    • Assessing dialyzer performance via total cell volume changes may not be reliable for all membranes and reprocessing methods.
    • Poor compliance with microbial contamination standards for reprocessing fluids was observed.
    • Current water treatment systems require improvements in design and monitoring.

    Conclusions:

    • On-line systems for determining dialyzer performance are superior to indirect methods.
    • Improvements in water treatment and adherence to microbial standards are necessary for safe dialyzer reprocessing.
    • Technological innovation is essential for expanded molecular weight range monitoring and routine sterile, non-pyrogenic reprocessing.