Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Developing wound evaluation tools

P Miller, D Powell

Nursing Standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)

|June 4, 1995

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces two new wound care evaluation tools to streamline recording of wound details. These tools aim to improve the clarity and efficiency of patient wound assessments in community settings.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Continuous heart rate variability monitoring, stress and recovery in doctors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Occupational medicine (Oxford, England)·2025

Same author

Transcriptome analysis of avian livers reveals different molecular changes to three urban pollutants: Soot, artificial light at night and noise.

Environmental pollution (Barking, Essex : 1987)·2024

Same author

UK funding agency launches digital health hubs: a new catalyst for change?

NPJ digital medicine·2024

Same author

Evaluating the genetic consequences of population subdivision as it unfolds and how to best mitigate them: A rare story about koalas.

Molecular ecology·2023

Same author

A preliminary study of cerebral blood flow, aging and dementia in people with Down syndrome.

Journal of intellectual disability research : JIDR·2020

Same author

Publisher Correction: A dynamically cold disk galaxy in the early Universe.

Nature·2020

Same journal

Effect of artificial intelligence on nursing documentation and patient safety.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026

Same journal

Strategies for responding to anger from patients, relatives and carers.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026

Same journal

Nurses' role in detecting early and subtle signs of patient deterioration in acute hospitals.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026

Same journal

Pulse oximetry: exploring its role, limitations and challenges in clinical practice.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026

Same journal

Anorexia nervosa: identification and management by non-specialist nurses.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026

Same journal

Skin and soft tissue abscesses: assessment and management.

Nursing standard (Royal College of Nursing (Great Britain) : 1987)·2026

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Wound Care Management
Healthcare Informatics
Clinical Evaluation Tools

Background:

Effective wound documentation is crucial for patient care continuity and treatment efficacy.
Current methods for recording wound details can be time-consuming and lack standardization.
The need for standardized, efficient tools in community-based wound care is recognized.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop and evaluate two novel assessment tools for wound care documentation.
To enhance the succinctness and logical flow of recording wound details.
To facilitate improved wound assessment in community healthcare settings.

Main Methods:

Development of two distinct evaluation tools: one for open wounds and one for closed wounds.
Pilot testing and trial of the developed tools within a community healthcare setting.

Related Experiment Videos

Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the recorded wound data.

Main Results:

The developed tools were found to encourage more concise and logical recording of wound information.
Initial trial results indicate potential for improved efficiency in wound assessment.
Feedback from community healthcare providers on tool usability was collected.

Conclusions:

The new evaluation tools show promise in standardizing and improving wound care documentation.
Further research and wider implementation could enhance the quality of community wound care.
Succinct and logical recording of wound details is achievable with structured evaluation tools.