Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Optimal case-control matching in practice

J B Cologne1, Y Shibata

  • 1Department of Statistics, Radiation Effects Research Foundation, Nagasaki, Japan.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|May 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prevalence of adult-onset multifactorial disease among offspring of atomic bomb survivors.

Radiation research·2008
Same author

Liver cancer in atomic-bomb survivors: histological characteristics and relationships to radiation and hepatitis B and C viruses.

Journal of radiation research·2001
Same author

FISH examination of lymphocytes from Mayak workers for assessment of translocation induction rate under chronic radiation exposures.

International journal of radiation biology·2001
Same author

Temporal changes in liver cancer incidence rates in Japan: accounting for death certificate inaccuracies and improving diagnostic techniques.

International journal of cancer·2001
Same author

Impact of comparison group on cohort dose response regression: an example using risk estimation in atomic-bomb survivors.

Health physics·2001
Same author

Chromosomal instability in BRCA1- or BRCA2-defective human cancer cells detected by spontaneous micronucleus assay.

Mutation research·2001
Same journal

Application of the E-value under non-proportional hazards.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Can the All of Us sample be reweighted to mirror a nationally representative sample? A comparison of mortality predictors.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Gut health, systemic inflammation, and linear growth among Indonesian infants: findings from the Action Against Stunting Hub observation cohort: Erratum.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Estimators in Partially Identified Models.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Stratification and accumulation? Explaining changing mortality inequities between business owners and non-owners in the U.S. (1984-2022).

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Be wary of age-stratum aging in early-onset cancer trends.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
See all related articles

This study compares matching techniques for case-control studies, finding that weighted distance measures offer better covariate balance than balancing scores in practice. These findings improve retrospective study designs for epidemiological research.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Retrospective case-control designs are common in epidemiology.
  • Defining covariate balance is crucial for valid causal inference in these studies.
  • Existing matching techniques may have limitations in practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the practical performance of different matching techniques in retrospective case-control studies.
  • To evaluate matching on a balancing score versus matching on a weighted distance measure.
  • To highlight the utility of optimal matching using network algorithms.

Main Methods:

  • Empirical comparison of matching on a balancing score and a weighted distance measure.
  • Utilizing efficient network algorithms for optimal matching.
  • Illustration using a case-control study of hepatitis B virus infection and liver cancer in atomic bomb survivors.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Both balancing score and weighted distance measures aim to balance covariate distributions.
  • Weighted distance measures provide superior practical balance compared to balancing scores.
  • Balancing scores can be prone to poor estimation in practice.

Conclusions:

  • Weighted distance measures are recommended for practical matching in retrospective case-control studies.
  • Optimal matching based on network algorithms enhances study design.
  • Accurate covariate balance is essential for reliable epidemiological findings.