Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Cluster analysis application to Class I malocclusion

I G Espona1, J T Gomez, J B Carmona

  • 1Department of Orthodontics, University of Granada, Spain.

European Journal of Orthodontics
|June 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

This study identified subtypes of Class I malocclusion using cluster analysis. Protrusive traits like incisive proclination were key identifiers, with patterns clearer in younger patients.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Rapid streptococcal antigen detection in experimental keratitis.

American journal of ophthalmology·1989
Same author

Comparison of acridine orange and Gram stains in bacterial keratitis.

American journal of ophthalmology·1988
Same author

[Biochemical analysis of human parotid saliva in a Spanish population].

Revista espanola de estomatologia·1984
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Dental Morphology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Class I malocclusion is common, but its subtypes require statistical definition.
  • Understanding subtypes aids in targeted orthodontic treatment planning.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To statistically derive Class I malocclusion subtypes using cluster analysis.
  • To characterize clinical and cephalometric features of these subtypes.
  • To investigate the influence of age and sex on malocclusion clustering.

Main Methods:

  • Cluster analysis applied to 416 Spanish patients (8-16 years old) with Class I malocclusion.
  • Utilized 20 clinical and cephalometric variables (Ricketts' analysis).
  • Analyzed sex and age effects on identified clusters.

Main Results:

  • Cluster analysis identified subtypes primarily based on lower incisive proclination and labial protrusion.
  • Less dental crowding and reduced pogonion-NB distance were also significant.
  • Distinct clustering patterns were more evident in younger individuals and diminished with age.
  • Similar clustering patterns were observed between males and females.

Conclusions:

  • Cluster analysis can differentiate Class I malocclusion subtypes based on specific cephalometric traits.
  • Protrusive features are significant discriminators for Class I malocclusion subtypes.
  • Age influences the manifestation of these subtypes, with patterns becoming less defined in older patients.

Related Experiment Videos