Comparison of training techniques using a patient-centered approach to smoking cessation

This study compared the use of 2 1/2-hour multimedia workshop with distribution of an algorithm on the ability of fourth-year medical students to present a stop-smoking plan to a simulated patient. Results showed that students who participated in the workshop performed statistically significantly better on the skill areas of providing information, eliciting and responding to feeling and on content areas of past experience with quitting, resources available for change and negotiating a plan. There were no significant differences in the skill area of eliciting information and the content areas of motivation to stop smoking, factors that inhibit change and problems affecting the plan. Neither of the groups performed very well. The highest number of available points obtained by both groups was in eliciting information (53% in the algorithm group and 64% in the formal training group); however, most of the values were in the range of 10%-25% of possible points. Suggested reasons for the low values may be due to the specific items rated, the teaching methods or the time needed to assimilate new skills.