Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Creativity and affective illness: an objection

A Rothenberg1

  • 1Harvard University, USA.

Perceptual and Motor Skills
|February 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study challenges previous research linking creativity and affective illness. Our findings demonstrate a clear statistical distinction between creative thinking and psychopathological responses, refuting prior claims.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Creativity, self creation, and the treatment of mental illness.

Medical humanities·2013
Same author

Bipolar illness, creativity, and treatment.

The Psychiatric quarterly·2001
Same author

The neurologic illness of Eugene O'Neill.

The New England journal of medicine·2000
Same author

Depression, physical illness, and the faces of Rembrandt.

Lancet (London, England)·1999
Same author

Diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive illness.

The Psychiatric clinics of North America·1999
Same author

Creativity and mental illness.

The American journal of psychiatry·1995

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Psychiatry
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Recent studies suggest a link between creativity and affective illness.
  • These studies have faced criticism regarding methodology and statistical analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate existing research on creativity and affective illness.
  • To present experimental evidence differentiating creative thinking from psychopathological responses.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of methodological flaws in previous studies (e.g., inadequate controls, biased selection).
  • Conducting controlled experiments to assess creative thinking and psychopathology.
  • Applying rigorous statistical analysis to experimental data.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identified significant methodological limitations in prior research.
  • Experimental results show a statistically significant differentiation between creative thinking and psychopathological responses.
  • Contradicts the purported connection between creativity and affective illness.

Conclusions:

  • The previously suggested link between creativity and affective illness is not supported by robust evidence.
  • Creative thinking and psychopathology represent distinct psychological constructs.
  • Methodological rigor is crucial in research on creativity and mental health.