Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Gender differences in eyewitness testimony

S J Butts1, K D Mixon, M S Mulekar

  • 1University of South Alabama, USA.

Perceptual and Motor Skills
|February 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Online symptom checker diagnostic and triage accuracy for HIV and hepatitis C.

Epidemiology and infection·2019
Same author

Loss of N-Myc interactor promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition by activation of TGF-β/SMAD signaling.

Oncogene·2013
Same author

DNAJB6 chaperones PP2A mediated dephosphorylation of GSK3β to downregulate β-catenin transcription target, osteopontin.

Oncogene·2012
Same author

A successful and unsuccessful replication of William Stern's eyewitness research.

Perceptual and motor skills·1989
Same author

Wilhelm Wundt's publication record: a re-examination.

Storia e critica della psicologia·1983
Same author

The establishment of Wilhelm Wundt's Leipzig laboratory.

Storia e critica della psicologia·1980
Same journal

Theoretical and Psychological Mechanisms of Perceptual-Motor Learning in AI Bots-Assisted Art Education.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Development and Measurement Properties of a Custom-Built Punch Force Dynamometer Based on S-Type Load Cells.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Do Elite Taekwondo Athletes Invest Time for Better Choices? Analysis of Anticipatory Behavior Through a Perception-Action Coupling Task.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Multisensory Contributions in Joint Actions: A Scoping Review.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Proprioceptive Impairment and Joint Position Exposure Time in Relation to Patient-Report Outcome With Chronic Ankle Instability.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
Same journal

Static Tactical Diagrams and Imagination: Differential Effects on Novice and Expert Handball Players.

Perceptual and motor skills·2026
See all related articles

This study found no significant gender differences in eyewitness accuracy or susceptibility to misinformation among college students. Previous research suggested differences, but this investigation used comparable groups to re-examine eyewitness behavior.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Forensic Psychology

Background:

  • Early research by William Stern (1903-1904) suggested women's eyewitness testimony was less accurate than men's.
  • Stern's study lacked comparable age groups, and later research (Bringmann et al., 1986) failed to replicate his findings with age-matched participants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate potential gender differences in eyewitness behavior.
  • To assess accuracy of recall and resistance to misleading information in short-term memory tasks.
  • To examine eyewitness performance using comparable groups of male and female college students.

Main Methods:

  • Employed two stimulus presentations with varying content and complexity.
  • Recruited 20 male and 20 female college students as participants.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Administered tests to measure accuracy of recall and resistance to false information.

    • Main Results:

    • No statistically significant differences were observed between male and female students.
    • Both genders exhibited comparable accuracy in recalling information.
    • Resistance to misleading information did not differ significantly between the groups.

    Conclusions:

    • The findings do not support historical claims of inherent gender-based differences in eyewitness testimony accuracy.
    • This study highlights the importance of using comparable groups in research on eyewitness behavior.
    • Further research may explore other factors influencing eyewitness performance beyond gender.