Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Endoscopically assisted biplanar forehead lift

O M Ramirez1

  • 1Division of Plastic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md., USA.

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|August 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Subperiosteal endoscopic techniques in secondary rhytidectomy.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2009
Same author

Complications of carbon dioxide laser resurfacing and their prevention.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2009
Same author

Fourth-generation subperiosteal approach to the midface: the tridimensional functional cheek lift.

Aesthetic surgery journal·2009
Same author

The central oval of the face: tridimensional endoscopic rejuvenation.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2002
Same author

Comprehensive approach to rejuvenation of the neck.

Facial plastic surgery : FPS·2001
Same author

Full face rejuvenation in three dimensions: a "face-lifting" for the new millennium.

Aesthetic plastic surgery·2001
Same journal

Building Practical Artificial Intelligence Tools For The Plastic Surgeon: A Step-By-Step Guide To Cowork.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Interpretation Matters: Common Statistical Pitfalls in Retrospective Surgical Research.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

"Inferior Repositioning of the High-Riding Nipple Using a Parenchymal-Based Flap".

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

A Four-Step Strategy for the Treatment of Facial Rhytids: A Focus on Upper Facial Wrinkles.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Evaluating Long-Term Retention of Fresh-Frozen Costal Cartilage Allograft in An Animal Model.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Manual extrusion of fat granules for primary thinning of a bulky flap.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces a biplanar forehead lift combining subperiosteal and subcutaneous approaches for brow lifting. This technique effectively reduces forehead height while preserving sensation and frontalis muscle function.

Area of Science:

  • Plastic Surgery
  • Aesthetic Surgery

Background:

  • Standard brow lifting techniques have limitations, including restricted patient selection for subgaleal coronal incisions and high vascular complication rates for subcutaneous hairline approaches.
  • Subperiosteal brow lifts offer superior periorbital remodeling, while subcutaneous approaches preserve sensation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a novel biplanar forehead lift technique that integrates subperiosteal and subcutaneous approaches.
  • To leverage the advantages of both techniques while mitigating their respective disadvantages for brow elevation and forehead height reduction.

Main Methods:

  • A combined subperiosteal and subcutaneous dissection technique was employed, utilizing endoscopic control for precise periorbital dissection and brow depressor muscle modification.
  • Initial dissection occurred in the subcutaneous plane, followed by deeper dissection through slit incisions in the galea-periosteal layer and temporoparietal fascia.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Endoscopic visualization guided periosteal dissection, arcus marginalis release, and brow depressor muscle modification. Deep anchoring sutures secured the elevated brow.
  • Main Results:

    • The biplanar forehead lift was performed on 24 patients, yielding highly satisfactory aesthetic outcomes.
    • All patients experienced a reduction in forehead height, and sensation posterior to the hairline incision was preserved.
    • Frontalis muscle function remained intact, and complications were minor.

    Conclusions:

    • The biplanar subperiosteal-subcutaneous forehead lift is a versatile and effective technique for brow elevation and forehead height reduction.
    • This approach successfully combines the benefits of subperiosteal and subcutaneous dissection, offering improved periorbital remodeling and preserved sensation.
    • Endoscopic assistance enhances procedural accuracy and control, contributing to excellent patient outcomes and minimal complications.