Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 19, 2026

Inducing Meningococcal Meningitis Serogroup C in Mice via Intracisternal Delivery
Published on: November 5, 2019
Randomized comparison of meropenem with cefotaxime for treatment of bacterial meningitis. Meropenem Meningitis Study
1Department of Medical Microbiology, University of Witwatersrand, South Africa.
Abstract:
Broad-spectrum cephalosporins are drugs of choice for the treatment of meningitis in communities which can afford them. The emergence of cephalosporin-resistant pneumococci demands the clinical trial of alternate agents. Carbapenems are active against the bacteria causing meningitis, but the use of imipenem-cilastatin was frustrated by drug-associated seizures. The safety and efficacy of meropenem, a new carbapenem, were compared to those of cefotaxime in a prospective randomized trial of 190 children with bacterial meningitis. Seizures occurred within 24 h before antibiotic therapy in 16 of 98 patients (16%) randomized to receive meropenem and in 6 of 92 patients (7%) randomized to receive cefotaxime. In patients without seizures before therapy, seizures occurred during therapy in 5 of 82 patients (6%) receiving meropenem and in 1 of 86 patients (1%) receiving cefotaxime (95% confidence interval: -0.7%, 10.6%). None were thought to be drug related. Twenty-four meropenem-treated patients (24%) and 11 cefotaxime-treated patients (12%) had neurological abnormalities before therapy. In patients without pretherapy neurological abnormalities, these abnormalities were present after treatment in 4 of 74 meropenem-treated patients (5%) and in 2 of 81 cefotaxime-treated patients (2%) (95% confidence interval: -3.2%, 9.1%). Of 75 meropenem-treated and 64 cefotaxime-treated patients with pretherapy positive cerebrospinal-fluid cultures, 68 and 59, respectively, had repeat lumbar punctures. Bacterial eradication was found to be 100% in both groups. Our data suggest that meropenem may be a carbapenem agent that is well tolerated and effective in the treatment of bacterial meningitis.
Insights
Meropenem shows promise as an effective treatment for bacterial meningitis, with comparable safety and efficacy to cefotaxime. This carbapenem offers an alternative option for treating meningitis, particularly with rising cephalosporin resistance.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Pediatrics
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Broad-spectrum cephalosporins are standard treatments for bacterial meningitis.
- Emerging cephalosporin-resistant pneumococci necessitate alternative antimicrobial agents.
- Previous carbapenem use (imipenem-cilastatin) was limited by seizure side effects.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the safety and efficacy of meropenem versus cefotaxime in treating pediatric bacterial meningitis.
- To evaluate meropenem as a potential alternative agent for meningitis treatment.
Main Methods:
- Prospective randomized trial involving 190 children diagnosed with bacterial meningitis.
- Patients were assigned to receive either meropenem or cefotaxime.
- Safety outcomes (seizures, neurological abnormalities) and efficacy (bacterial eradication) were assessed.
Main Results:
- Seizure incidence before therapy was 16% for meropenem and 7% for cefotaxime.
- Seizure incidence during therapy was 6% for meropenem and 1% for cefotaxime; none were drug-related.
- Bacterial eradication was 100% in both treatment groups.
Conclusions:
- Meropenem demonstrates favorable safety and efficacy in treating bacterial meningitis.
- Meropenem represents a well-tolerated and effective carbapenem option for meningitis.
- Further investigation into meropenem's role in meningitis treatment is warranted.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmaceutical Alternatives: Stability-Related Therapeutic Nonequivalence
Bacterial Meningitis
Mechanism of Antibiotic Resistance in MRSA
Viral Meningitis
Bacterial Meningitis I: Introduction
Bacterial Meningitis II: Pathophysiology

