Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Individual differences in slow brain potentials in a guessing task

B I Kotchoubey1, B Grözinger, H End

  • 1Department of Neurophysiology, University of Ulm, Germany.

Archives Italiennes De Biologie
|March 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[On free will].

Fortschritte der Neurologie-Psychiatrie·2006
Same author

[Prevention of dementia (including Alzheimer's disease)].

Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))·2004
Same author

Brain morphology in adolescents at genetic risk for schizophrenia assessed by qualitative and quantitative magnetic resonance imaging.

Schizophrenia research·1999
Same author

[Sevoflurane and the nervous system].

Der Anaesthesist·1999
Same author

Localisation of epileptic foci with electric, magnetic and combined electromagnetic models.

Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology·1998
Same author

Bereitschaftspotential in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS): lower amplitudes in patients with hyperreflexia (spasticity).

Acta neurologica Scandinavica·1998
Same journal

The potential effects of nutrients and light on autophagy-mediated visual function and clearance of retinal aggregates.

Archives italiennes de biologie·2023
Same journal

Effects of thymoquinone on spinal cord injury in rats.

Archives italiennes de biologie·2023
Same journal

Evaluation of daily Laurus nobilis tea consumption on anxiety and stress biomarkers in healthy volunteers.

Archives italiennes de biologie·2023
Same journal

Audiological evaluation of the cochlear nerve with brainstem evoked response audiometry in patients with COVID-19.

Archives italiennes de biologie·2023
Same journal

Proflactic effects of rosmarinic acid on spinal cord injury in rats.

Archives italiennes de biologie·2023
Same journal

Spreading depolarization: A phenomenon in the brain.

Archives italiennes de biologie·2022
See all related articles

Individuals predicting events can either follow cues or reject them. Cue rejection, associated with specific brain activity like the Bereitschaftspotential (BP), led to better outcomes by minimizing errors.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Making

Background:

  • Predicting non-equiprobable events involves processing probabilistic cues.
  • Individual strategies in cue utilization can impact decision-making outcomes.
  • Brain activity, including the Bereitschaftspotential (BP) and stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN), reflects cognitive processes during decision-making.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate neural correlates of cue utilization strategies in probabilistic event prediction.
  • To differentiate brain activity patterns between cue-following and cue-rejecting individuals.
  • To explore how these patterns relate to decision outcomes and error minimization.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded electroencephalography (EEG) signals, specifically the Bereitschaftspotential (BP) and stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Utilized a task where 18 healthy right-handed subjects predicted non-equiprobable events using button presses.
  • Categorized participants based on their tendency to follow or reject probabilistic cues presented before each trial.

    • Main Results:

    • Cue rejection was associated with a larger final gain compared to cue acceptance.
    • Cue-rejecting individuals showed localized BP increases over the right parietal cortex for low-probable cues and increased SPN amplitude.
    • Cue-following individuals exhibited larger overall BP amplitudes and consistently large SPN amplitudes, potentially reflecting error minimization efforts.

    Conclusions:

    • Distinct neural signatures differentiate cue-following and cue-rejecting strategies in probabilistic prediction.
    • The strategy of cue rejection, linked to specific parietal BP activity, appears more advantageous for maximizing gains.
    • Observed brain activity patterns in cue-followers may indicate heightened sensitivity to potential errors, influencing their decision-making process.