Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Brachytherapy: criteria for case selection

M E Randall1, K M Greven

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University Medical Center, Indianapolis 46202-5114, USA.

Cancer Investigation
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Head and neck radiotherapy quality assurance conference for dedicated review of delineated targets and organs at risk: results of a prospective study.

Journal of radiotherapy in practice·2024
Same author

PD/PDT for gynecological disease: A clinical review.

Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy·2014
Same author

Retrospective analysis of the impact of HPV status and smoking on mucositis in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Oral oncology·2014
Same author

Endometrial carcinoma: the current role of adjuvant radiation.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2009
Same author

Quantitative analysis of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy techniques for posterior fossa treatment in children.

Technology in cancer research & treatment·2003
Same author

Relapse in the skull after myeloablative therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma.

Pediatric hematology and oncology·2003
Same journal

Analysis of Second Primary Tumours in Cutaneous Lymphoma Populations.

Cancer investigation·2026
Same journal

The Heterogeneity of B Cells Potentially Contributes to Metastasis of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinomas.

Cancer investigation·2026
Same journal

The Association Between Lymphocyte-Monocyte Ratio, Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes, and Tumor-Associated Macrophages with 3-Year Progression-Free Survival in Advanced Local Stage Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients.

Cancer investigation·2026
Same journal

<i>In Vivo</i> Pharmacokinetics, Bio-Distribution and anti-Tumor Activity of Docetaxel-Loaded Folate Targeted Biocompatible Polymeric Micelles.

Cancer investigation·2026
Same journal

Bispecific Antibodies in Multiple Myeloma: A Concise Review of Current Treatments.

Cancer investigation·2026
Same journal

Adrenal Carcinoma Laterality is of Limited Clinical Significance: A National Perspective.

Cancer investigation·2026
See all related articles

A new scoring system helps select patients for brachytherapy, a cancer treatment. This system considers tumor type and treatment risks, improving case selection for better outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Radiation Oncology
  • Medical Physics

Background:

  • Brachytherapy is a recognized cancer treatment modality.
  • Successful brachytherapy relies on planning, technique, and execution.
  • Optimal case selection criteria for brachytherapy are not well-defined.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a semiquantitative system for brachytherapy case selection.
  • To identify key variables influencing brachytherapy utilization.
  • To facilitate informed decision-making in brachytherapy treatment planning.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a scoring system (0-8) for brachytherapy case selection.
  • Considered variables: malignancy natural history, procedural risks, implant site accessibility, and alternative treatment outcomes.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applied the system to various malignancies to generate scores.

    • Main Results:

    • Generated Brachytherapy Case Selection Scores for multiple cancer types.
    • Higher scores correlated with sites where brachytherapy is commonly used.
    • Indicated clinical relevance of the considered factors.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed scoring system appears clinically relevant for brachytherapy case selection.
    • This system can aid in evaluating individual patient suitability for brachytherapy.
    • Further analysis of brachytherapy case selection is warranted.