Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 10, 2026

Human In-Vivo Bioassay for the Tissue-Specific Measurement of Nociceptive and Inflammatory Mediators
Published on: December 1, 2008
Buffered lidocaine for skin infiltration prior to hemodialysis
1Rush Medical College, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Insights
Buffering lidocaine (BL) with sodium bicarbonate did not significantly reduce pain during arterial and venous cannulation for pediatric hemodialysis. Injection speed, however, appeared to influence pain perception in children undergoing these procedures.
Area of Science:
- Anesthesiology
- Pediatric Nephrology
Background:
- Local anesthesia is crucial for procedures like hemodialysis cannulation in children.
- Lidocaine is commonly used, but its buffering status may affect pain perception.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of buffered versus unbuffered lidocaine in reducing pain during cannulation for pediatric hemodialysis.
- To evaluate patient-reported and observed pain levels associated with different lidocaine preparations.
Main Methods:
- A randomized, blinded study involving seven pediatric hemodialysis patients (ages 6-18).
- Compared 1% lidocaine (L) with buffered lidocaine (BL) prepared by adding sodium bicarbonate.
- Assessed pain via self-report and behavioral observations during 101 dialysis treatments.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in self-reported or observed pain were found between buffered and unbuffered lidocaine during infiltration or cannulation.
- Injection speed, which was not controlled, emerged as a potential factor influencing pain.
Conclusions:
- Buffering lidocaine with sodium bicarbonate did not demonstrate a significant advantage in reducing cannulation pain for pediatric hemodialysis.
- Further research into technique variables, such as injection speed, is warranted to optimize pain management in this population.
Abstract:
This study compared the effects of buffered versus unbuffered lidocaine when used as local anesthetic in preparation for cannulation of the arterial and venous sites of children requiring hemodialysis. The subjects for this study were seven children, ages 6-18 years, observed during 101 dialysis treatments. For each subject undergoing hemodialysis on a given day, one syringe containing 1% lidocaine (L) and one containing buffered lidocaine (BL) were prepared. The BL solution was prepared by adding 2 mL of 8.4% sodium bicarbonate to 20 mL of 1% lidocaine just prior to use. The choice of local anesthetic used for cannulation of the arterial or venous site was randomly assigned to be either L or BL. Nurses, raters, and subjects were blind to contents of the syringe. The procedures for piercing the skin, pausing, and infiltrating were standardized, as was the volume administered. Speed of injection was not controlled. Comparisons of self-reported pain and behavioral observations for L versus BL revealed no significant differences for pain of infiltration or pain of cannulation. Technique variables such as the speed of injection, which tended to be very slow for these children, appear to significantly influence infiltration pain and the relative merits of buffering.
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Pharmacokinetics
Local Anesthetics: Common Agents and Their Applications
Cocaine is an ester of benzoic acid and methylecgogine. It is used to anesthetize and vasoconstrict locally. Currently, it is used primarily for topical applications. It is beneficial for surgeries on the upper respiratory tract, providing anesthesia and shrinking the mucosa. Cocaine in the form of cocaine hydrochloride is...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Intravenous Regional Anesthesia
One of the advantages of...
Hemodialysis I: Introduction
Hemodialysis II: Procedure and Complications

