Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A clinically based rule of thumb for classifying delusions

J Walkup1

  • 1Graduate School of Applied and Professional Psychology, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08855, USA.

Schizophrenia Bulletin
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Challenging patient delusions may offer short-term benefits, but some delusions are resistant. This review guides clinicians on when to confront delusional beliefs and suggests alternatives for treatment-resistant cases.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Genome-wide association study of Tourette's syndrome.

Molecular psychiatry·2012
Same author

Concepts of social capital.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2003
Same author

Racial differences in end-of-life care for patients with AIDS.

AIDS & public policy journal·2002
Same author

Cluster and regional influences on suicide in a Southwestern American Indian tribe.

Social science & medicine (1982)·2001
Same author

Home-care use and expenditures among Medicaid beneficiaries with AIDS.

Health care financing review·2001
Same author

Complications of SSRI treatment.

Journal of child and adolescent psychopharmacology·2001

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Clinical Psychology

Background:

  • Traditional psychodynamic therapy often avoided confronting patient delusions due to their perceived defensive roles.
  • Emerging research and clinical observations suggest that challenging delusional beliefs can be beneficial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review clinical and research factors influencing the decision to confront patient delusions.
  • To identify specific types of delusions unlikely to respond to confrontation.
  • To propose alternative therapeutic strategies for these resistant delusions.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of clinical case studies and empirical research on psychodynamic therapy and delusion confrontation.
  • Analysis of theoretical underpinnings of delusional beliefs and their defensive functions.
  • Synthesis of evidence regarding the efficacy and limitations of confronting delusions.

Main Results:

  • Short-term positive outcomes have been reported from confronting certain delusional beliefs.
  • A specific class of delusions has been identified as unlikely to benefit from direct confrontation.
  • Clinical decision-making frameworks for confronting delusions are proposed.

Conclusions:

  • Clinicians should carefully consider the nature of delusions before deciding to confront them.
  • Alternative therapeutic approaches are necessary for delusions resistant to confrontation.
  • Integrating research findings into clinical practice can optimize treatment for patients with delusions.

Related Experiment Videos