Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Regional anesthesia: is it safer?

S M Ouellette, R Ouellette

    CRNA : the Clinical Forum for Nurse Anesthetists
    |May 1, 1995
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This article reviews general anesthesia and regional anesthesia, detailing their pros, cons, and associated complications. It offers insights into mortality and morbidity for both anesthetic techniques.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Neurofilament light chain as a marker for cortical atrophy in multiple sclerosis without radiological signs of disease activity.

    Journal of internal medicine·2021
    Same author

    Expression of the 5-HT2A serotoninergic receptor in human placenta and choriocarcinoma cells: mitogenic implications of serotonin.

    Placenta·2005
    Same author

    Professional conflicts in anaesthesia in the United States.

    Anaesthesia·2004
    Same author

    TheNational Commission on Nurse Anesthesia Education 10 years later--Part 1: The commission years (1989-1994).

    AANA journal·2002
    Same author

    The International Federation of Nurse Anesthetists: its role in the globalization of nurse anesthesia education and practice.

    CRNA : the clinical forum for nurse anesthetists·2002
    Same author

    The National Commission on Nurse Anesthesia Education 10 years later--Part 2: Years following the commission (1994 to present).

    AANA journal·2002
    Same journal

    Death of a journal: lost opportunities, new challenges, or both?

    CRNA : the clinical forum for nurse anesthetists·2002
    Same journal

    Hypnosis principles and applications: an adjunct to health care.

    CRNA : the clinical forum for nurse anesthetists·2002
    Same journal

    The use of hypnosis in a primary care setting.

    CRNA : the clinical forum for nurse anesthetists·2002
    Same journal

    Healing pathways through energy work in the perianesthesia care setting.

    CRNA : the clinical forum for nurse anesthetists·2002
    Same journal

    Clinical applications of acupuncture in anesthesia practice.

    CRNA : the clinical forum for nurse anesthetists·2002
    Same journal

    The use of pre-, intra-, and posthypnotic suggestion in anesthesia and surgery.

    CRNA : the clinical forum for nurse anesthetists·2002
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Anesthesiology
    • Surgical Procedures

    Background:

    • General anesthesia and regional anesthesia are primary methods for surgical pain management.
    • Understanding their respective risks and benefits is crucial for patient safety.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To provide a comprehensive overview of current general and regional anesthesia techniques.
    • To detail the advantages, disadvantages, mortality, and morbidity associated with each technique.
    • To highlight common complications following the use of these anesthetic methods.

    Main Methods:

    • Literature review and synthesis of current data on anesthesia practices.
    • Comparative analysis of general versus regional anesthesia outcomes.
    • Inclusion of data on patient complications, mortality, and morbidity.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • General anesthesia involves systemic drug administration, posing risks like respiratory depression and cardiovascular effects.
    • Regional anesthesia targets specific body areas, offering benefits such as reduced systemic effects but risks like nerve damage.
    • Both techniques have distinct complication profiles, mortality rates, and morbidity outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • The choice between general and regional anesthesia depends on patient factors, surgical procedure, and desired outcomes.
    • Careful patient selection and monitoring are essential to minimize complications and optimize results.
    • Continued research is needed to refine techniques and improve safety in anesthesia practice.