Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2026

MRI and PET in Mouse Models of Myocardial Infarction
Published on: December 19, 2013
[Myocardial contractility and viability. A radionuclide tomography study using technetium-99m labeled isonitriles]
G Tamosiunas1, J Castell, J Candell Riera
1Servico de Cardiología, Hospital General Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona.
Insights
Quantitative SPECT analysis reveals significant myocardial viability in akinetic and dyskinetic regions of patients with coronary artery disease, challenging visual assessment. This highlights the need for quantitative methods to accurately evaluate viable myocardium.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nuclear Medicine
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Limited studies explore myocardial viability patterns and contractility in coronary artery disease (CAD).
- Accurate assessment of viable myocardium is crucial for guiding treatment decisions in CAD patients.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify viable and nonviable myocardium using 99m-technetium isonitriles SPECT.
- To correlate myocardial viability with left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities in CAD.
Main Methods:
- Investigated 61 consecutive CAD patients.
- Utilized qualitative and quantitative analysis of 99mTc-isonitriles SPECT, compared with ventriculography.
- Defined viable myocardium as 40% or higher of peak uptake.
Main Results:
- 72% of regions had normal perfusion; 41% were ischemic; 19% had severe irreversible defects.
- Wall motion was normal in 72%, hypokinetic in 12%, and akinetic/dyskinetic in 16% of regions.
- Akinetic/dyskinetic regions showed significantly less viable myocardium (64.8%) compared to normokinetic (98.8%) and hypokinetic (86.1%) regions.
Conclusions:
- Positive viability criteria were found in 61% of akinetic/dyskinetic regions with severe irreversible defects.
- Visual assessment of 99mTc-MIBI SPECT underestimates viable myocardium.
- Quantitative SPECT analysis is essential for accurate myocardial viability evaluation.
Background:
There are comparatively few studies evaluating the patterns of myocardial viability and its relation with contractility in patients with coronary artery disease. The aim of the present study was to quantify the viable and nonviable myocardium, using 99m-technetium isonitriles SPET, as related with left ventricular regional wall motion abnormalities.
Method:
61 consecutive patients with coronary artery disease were investigated. The severity and extension of the defects were evaluated using a qualitative and quantitative analysis of the 99mTc-isonitriles SPET and compared with ventricular wall motion in contrast ventriculography. An uptake level of 40% of peak uptake or higher was considered as indicating viable myocardium.
Results:
Of the 244 evaluated regions (4 per patient), 72 (29%) had normal perfusion, 100 (41%) were ischemic, 25 (10%) had a mild irreversible defect and 47 (19%) had a severe irreversible defect. Wall motion was normal in 176 regions (72%), 29 (12%) were hypokinetic, and 39 (16%) were akinetic of dyskinetic. The amount of viable myocardium in akinetic and dyskinetic regions (64.8%) was significantly different (p < 0.05) from that in hypokinetic (86.1%) and normokinetic (98.8%) regions. Visual assessment of uptake underestimated myocardial viability, as quantitative analysis disclosed that in 61% of akinetic and dyskinetic regions with severe irreversible defects there was more than 50% of viable myocardium.
Conclusions:
In 61% of akinetic and dyskinetic regions with a severe irreversible defect in perfusion scintigraphy positive viability criteria were found. Therefore, visual assessment of the myocardial perfusion studies using 99mTc-MIBI SPET underestimates viable myocardium. Tomographic studies with quantification of the uptake and defect extension are required for a proper evaluation of viable myocardium.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT

