Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Esthetic root coverage in periodontics: a review

P O Cabrera1

  • 1Northwestern University Dental School, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

CDS Review
|March 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Achieving root coverage is a common yet difficult dental goal. This exploration examines various surgical techniques for root coverage, detailing their advantages and disadvantages.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The connective tissue graft with labial vestibular extension.

Practical periodontics and aesthetic dentistry : PPAD·1994
Same author

Connective tissue grafting: an option in reconstructive periodontal surgery.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·1994
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Periodontology
  • Restorative Dentistry

Background:

  • Root coverage procedures are frequently performed in periodontal and implant dentistry.
  • Recession defects pose esthetic and functional challenges for patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and compare the various surgical techniques available for root coverage.
  • To analyze the benefits and limitations associated with each root coverage method.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of surgical root coverage procedures.
  • Comparative analysis of different grafting materials and techniques.
  • Evaluation of clinical outcomes and patient-reported benefits.

Main Results:

  • Multiple surgical options exist for root coverage, each with unique indications.
  • Success rates and predictability vary significantly among different techniques.
  • Factors influencing outcomes include defect morphology, patient factors, and surgical approach.

Conclusions:

  • The choice of surgical technique for root coverage should be individualized based on specific clinical circumstances.
  • Understanding the benefits and limitations of each option is crucial for successful root coverage.
  • Further research is needed to optimize techniques and long-term outcomes for root coverage.

Related Experiment Videos