Related Experiment Videos
Indwelling versus intermittent feeding tubes in premature neonates
A Symington1, M Ballantyne, J Pinelli
1Chedoke-McMaster Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Summary
For premature infants, indwelling and intermittent feeding tubes showed no significant differences in weight gain, apnea, or bradycardia. The choice between feeding tube methods may depend on cost-effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Intensive Care
- Pediatric Gastroenterology
- Clinical Nutrition
Background:
- Premature neonates often require specialized feeding methods.
- Enteral feeding is crucial for growth and development in premature infants.
- Feeding tube placement techniques vary, impacting clinical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare indwelling versus intermittent feeding tube placement in premature neonates.
- To evaluate the effects on weight gain, apnea, and bradycardia.
- To inform clinical practice regarding feeding tube selection.
Main Methods:
- Randomized controlled trial in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs).
- Enrolled 93 neonates (24-34 weeks gestational age).
- Compared nasogastric indwelling tubes (up to 3 days) with orogastric intermittent tubes (per feeding).
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences in weight gain between groups.
- No significant differences in the frequency of apnea or bradycardia episodes.
- Demographics, clinical issues, and nutritional intake were similar.
Conclusions:
- Indwelling and intermittent feeding tubes yield comparable clinical outcomes in premature infants.
- The intermittent method incurs higher costs.
- Feeding tube selection can prioritize economic factors due to similar efficacy.