Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The detection of deception

D Faust1

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston 02881, USA.

Neurologic Clinics
|May 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Detecting malingering in patients is challenging for healthcare professionals, as subjective impressions can be unreliable. New methods are needed to supplement medical exams and improve the accuracy of identifying deception.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Climate deteriorations and Neanderthal demise in interior Iberia.

Scientific reports·2018
Same author

Cortical evoked potentials in spinal surgery.

Orthopedics·2014
Same author

TCDD deregulates contact inhibition in rat liver oval cells via Ah receptor, JunD and cyclin A.

Oncogene·2007
Same author

The folic acid metabolite L-5-methyltetrahydrofolate effectively reduces total serum homocysteine level in orthotopic liver transplant recipients: a double-blind placebo-controlled study.

European journal of clinical nutrition·2007
Same author

Treatment of patients with lamivudine-resistant and adefovir dipivoxil-resistant chronic hepatitis B virus infection: is tenofovir the answer?

Gut·2007
Same author

Polymorphisms in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene are determinant for vascular complications after liver transplantation.

European journal of clinical nutrition·2007

Area of Science:

  • Medical diagnosis
  • Forensic psychology
  • Clinical assessment

Background:

  • Patient honesty typically aligns with self-interest in clinical settings, but legal contexts may incentivize deception.
  • Healthcare professionals' ability to detect malingering is questionable, especially with poorly understood conditions or reliance on self-reporting.
  • Lack of feedback on diagnostic accuracy hinders the refinement of malingering detection skills.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the challenges in detecting patient malingering.
  • To evaluate the reliability of subjective clinical judgment in identifying malingering.
  • To explore supplementary methods for enhancing malingering detection accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing research on malingering detection.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of factors influencing diagnostic accuracy.
  • Discussion of methods to augment clinical examination.

    • Main Results:

    • Clinical experience alone is insufficient for accurate malingering detection.
    • Subjective confidence in diagnosis can be misleading.
    • Diagnostic accuracy is reduced when conditions are less understood or definitive tests are unavailable.

    Conclusions:

    • Over-reliance on subjective impressions is dangerous in malingering appraisal.
    • Systematic feedback is crucial for improving diagnostic skills.
    • Supplementary methods can significantly enhance the detection of malingering.