Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reading and evaluating qualitative research studies

N C Elder1, W L Miller

  • 1Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland 97201, USA.

The Journal of Family Practice
|September 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prevalence of thiamine deficiency in a stable heart failure outpatient cohort on standard loop diuretic therapy.

Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)·2016
Same author

Comparison of Macular Thickness in Patients with Keratoconus and Control Subjects Using the Cirrus HD-OCT.

BioMed research international·2015
Same author

Streptonivicin, a new antibiotic. V. Absorption, distribution, and excretion.

Antibiotics & chemotherapy (Northfield, Ill.)·2014
Same author

Evaluation of mosquito responses to pyrethroid insecticides topically applied to sheep.

Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association·2013
Same author

Analysis of the duplicated human C4/P450c21/X gene cluster.

The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology·2012
Same author

Testing process errors and their harms and consequences reported from family medicine practices: a study of the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network.

Quality & safety in health care·2008
Same journal

Does taking BP medicine at night (vs morning) result in fewer cardiovascular events?

The Journal of family practice·2023
Same journal

Preventing RSV in children and adults: A vaccine update.

The Journal of family practice·2023
Same journal

Essential oils: How safe? How effective?

The Journal of family practice·2023
Same journal

51-year-old woman • History of Graves disease • General fatigue, palpitations, and hand tremors • Dx?

The Journal of family practice·2023
Same journal

Renewing the dream.

The Journal of family practice·2023
Same journal

55-year-old woman • Myalgias and progressive symmetrical proximal weakness • History of unilateral renal agenesis, type 2 diabetes, and hyperlipidemia • Dx?

The Journal of family practice·2023
See all related articles

This guide helps busy family physicians evaluate qualitative research. Learn to identify valuable studies and understand their design and analysis using clinical analogies.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Research
  • Qualitative Studies
  • Family Medicine Literature

Background:

  • Qualitative research is increasingly published in family practice and medical journals.
  • Physicians need methods to assess the quality and relevance of this research.
  • Understanding qualitative research enhances evidence-based practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide family physicians with criteria for selecting worthwhile qualitative studies.
  • To equip readers with tools for evaluating qualitative research design and analysis.
  • To demystify the qualitative research process through relatable clinical analogies.

Main Methods:

  • The article uses clinical analogies to explain qualitative research concepts.
  • It focuses on practical aspects of study selection and evaluation.

Related Experiment Videos

  • No primary data collection or analysis was performed; this is a methodological review.

    • Main Results:

    • Readers will gain a framework for critically appraising qualitative research.
    • The article identifies key elements to consider when evaluating study rigor.
    • Understanding research design and analysis is made more accessible.

    Conclusions:

    • Busy clinicians can effectively engage with and evaluate qualitative research.
    • The article empowers physicians to integrate high-quality qualitative evidence into practice.
    • Clinical analogies improve comprehension of complex research methodologies.