Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interhemispheric links in brain stimulation reward

J Malette1, E Miliaressis

  • 1School of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ont., Canada.

Behavioural Brain Research
|June 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle: behavioral dissociation of its rewarding and activating effects.

Neuroscience letters·2009
Same author

Factors that influence the persistence of stimulation-induced aversion.

Physiology & behavior·2001
Same author

Interactions between rewarding lateral hypothalamic and aversive nucleus reticularis gigantocellularis stimulation.

Behavioural brain research·2000
Same author

Ventral pallidum self-stimulation induces stimulus dependent increase in c-fos expression in reward-related brain regions.

Neuroscience·1997
Same author

The bidirectional interaction between ventral tegmental rewarding and hindbrain aversive stimulation effects in the rat.

Brain research·1995
Same author

Poststimulation excitability of ventral pallidum self-stimulation neurons.

Behavioral neuroscience·1995
Same journal

Behavioral characterization of bulbar sensorimotor function in a rat model of Alexander disease.

Behavioural brain research·2026
Same journal

Prenatal Exposure to High- but Not Low-Molecular-Weight Poly(I:C) Produces Selective Sociability Deficits in Offspring.

Behavioural brain research·2026
Same journal

Understanding vulnerability through variability: a longitudinal twin study linking sex differences in neurodiversity, neurodevelopment and X-linked genetic mechanisms.

Behavioural brain research·2026
Same journal

Hippocampal plasticity predicts behavioral lateralization and stress resilience in laying hen chicks.

Behavioural brain research·2026
Same journal

Effects of retatrutide on learning and memory in streptozotocin-induced male diabetic rats.

Behavioural brain research·2026
Same journal

Bacopa-enriched formulation enhances memory and synaptic plasticity in a rat model of vascular dementia.

Behavioural brain research·2026
See all related articles

This study challenges the view of the medial forebrain bundle (MFB) as a unilateral self-stimulation system. Findings suggest MFB reward neurons have bilateral branches, impacting stimulation efficacy.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Behavioral Neuroscience
  • Neurophysiology

Background:

  • The medial forebrain bundle (MFB) self-stimulation (SS) system is traditionally considered unilateral.
  • Previous research has not fully explored the bilateral connectivity within the MFB reward pathways.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-examine the unilateral view of the MFB SS system.
  • To investigate the role of bilateral neuronal projections in MFB self-stimulation efficacy.

Main Methods:

  • Rats performed bar-pressing for MFB SS using bilateral electrodes with varying inter-pulse intervals.
  • Stimulation efficacy (SE) was measured as a function of inter-pulse interval and pulse order.
  • Computer modeling was used to interpret empirical results based on neuronal branching assumptions.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Contralateral hypothalamic (H) stimulation showed interval-dependent SE, resembling collision effects without apparent conduction time.
  • Transynaptic collision effects were observed between H and ventral tegmentum (VT) sites, but lacked synaptic delay.
  • Ipsilateral H-VT placements demonstrated typical collision effects, confirming direct ipsilateral MFB linkages.

Conclusions:

  • The MFB SS system is not strictly unilateral; reward neurons likely possess bilateral branches.
  • Conduction failure at neuronal branchpoints explains the observed stimulation efficacy patterns.
  • This branching model provides a testable framework for understanding MFB reward circuitry and lesion effects.