Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Radical prostatectomy: comparison of technics]

P Larcher1, M Casu, E Longoni

  • 1Ospedale San Giuseppe, Milano.

Archivio Italiano Di Urologia, Andrologia : Organo Ufficiale [Di] Societa Italiana Di Ecografia Urologica E Nefrologica
|June 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

Radical prostatectomy is effective for specific prostate cancer stages (T1b-T2c) in patients with good health and life expectancy. Retropubic surgery is preferred, excluding cases with high PSA, advanced stage, or metastasis.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Understanding polymicrobial bloodstream infections: clinical and microbiological insights from a Spanish university hospital.

Revista clinica espanola·2026
Same author

Description of an Enterococcus faecium genotype vanB outbreak in a hospitalization ward.

European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology·2025
Same author

Headache as main reason for consultation to a hospital Emergency Department in Spain: a prospective study.

Neurologia·2024
Same author

Proteasome-dependent degradation of histone H1 subtypes is mediated by its C-terminal domain.

Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society·2024
Same author

Robot assisted radical prostatectomy in fit older patients compared to a standard population: Clinical characteristics, surgical, oncological and functional outcomes.

Progres en urologie : journal de l'Association francaise d'urologie et de la Societe francaise d'urologie·2023
Same author

New Insights Into the Genetic Variability of <i>Fasciola Hepatica</i> (Trematoda) in Algeria and Relationships with Other Geographic Regions Revealed By Mitochondrial DNA.

Helminthologia·2022

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Surgical Oncology

Background:

  • Radical prostatectomy is a treatment option for prostate cancer.
  • Surgical approaches and patient selection are critical for successful outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy and patient selection criteria for radical prostatectomy.
  • To compare transperineal and retropubic approaches for radical prostatectomy.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective analysis of 46 patients (aged 44-75) who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1989 and present.
  • 44 patients had retropubic prostatectomy (20 with nerve-sparing technique), 2 had transperineal prostatectomy.
  • Inclusion criteria: clinical stages T1b, T1c, T2a, T2b, T2c with good ASA status and 10-year life expectancy.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Retropubic prostatectomy was the preferred approach.
  • This approach facilitated bilateral iliaco-obturator lymphadenectomy with frozen section analysis.
  • Contraindications identified: PSA > 60 ng/ml, clinical stage C, positive CT/bone scan for metastasis, age > 75.

Conclusions:

  • Radical prostatectomy is indicated for localized prostate cancer (T1b-T2c) in select patients.
  • Retropubic approach is favored for surgical access and lymphadenectomy.
  • Careful patient selection is crucial to optimize outcomes and avoid unnecessary interventions.