Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Single-slide versus double-slide Pap smear: a comparative study

V L Saitas1, C Hawthorne, J Cater

  • 1Department of Cytopathology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Diagnostic Cytopathology
|June 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Outbreak of Anthrax in Livestock with Human Occupational Exposures - Minnesota, 2023.

Journal of agromedicine·2024
Same author

Quality of life in breast cancer survivors: An assessment of international breast cancer dragon boat racers.

Lymphology·2021
Same author

Cerebrovascular Autoregulation Monitoring in the Management of Adult Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Delphi Consensus of Clinicians.

Neurocritical care·2021
Same author

A PC-based system for the objective analysis of histologic specimens through quantitative contextual karyometry.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Study of viral integration of HPV-16 in young patients with LSIL.

Journal of clinical pathology·2003
Same author

Circumscribed choroidal hemangioma: clinical manifestations and factors predictive of visual outcome in 200 consecutive cases.

Ophthalmology·2001
Same journal

Case Report: Pancreatic Paraganglioma Mimicking a Well-Differentiated Neuroendocrine Tumor: The Importance of Cytokeratin Immunohistochemistry.

Diagnostic cytopathology·2026
Same journal

Diagnostic Value of CCL2 and CCR2 in Pleural Effusion for Distinguishing Lung Cancer Histological Subtypes: A Retrospective Study.

Diagnostic cytopathology·2026
Same journal

Fibromyxoid Nephrogenic Adenoma Mimicking Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Diagnostic Pitfall in Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology.

Diagnostic cytopathology·2026
Same journal

Cytological Diagnosis of Primary Cardiac Angiosarcoma Presenting With Multiple Serous Effusions: A Case Report With Cell Block.

Diagnostic cytopathology·2026
Same journal

Application of Sydney System for Lymph Node Cytology at a Tertiary Care Centre in Central India.

Diagnostic cytopathology·2026
Same journal

Cytological Features of Clear Cell Sarcoma in Exfoliative and Effusion Cytology Specimen-A Case Report and Literature Review.

Diagnostic cytopathology·2026
See all related articles

The single-slide Pap smear method is as effective as the double-slide method for detecting cervical precancer and cancer. This study found no significant differences in specimen adequacy, quality, or disease detection rates between the two Pap smear techniques.

Area of Science:

  • Gynecologic Pathology
  • Cervical Cytology

Background:

  • Cervical cancer screening relies on accurate Pap smear analysis.
  • Optimizing Pap smear collection methods is crucial for diagnostic yield and efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of the single-slide versus the double-slide Pap smear methods.
  • To evaluate differences in specimen adequacy, quality, and disease detection rates.

Main Methods:

  • A comparative study involving 800 cases, with samples collected using both single-slide and double-slide techniques.
  • Ectocervical and endocervical samples were obtained using Ayre spatula and Cytobrush.
  • Specimens were evaluated for adequacy, quality, and detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and carcinomas.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant differences were observed between the single-slide and double-slide methods in specimen adequacy (P=0.31), quality (P=1.00), or disease detection (CIN P=0.71; carcinomas P=1.00).
  • The double-slide method yielded 4% CIN and 0.25% carcinomas, while the single-slide method detected 3.25% CIN and no carcinomas.
  • Specimen adequacy was high for both methods (single-slide: 86.7% satisfactory, 12.5% limited; double-slide: 88% satisfactory, 12% limited).

Conclusions:

  • The single-slide Pap smear method appears to be as efficacious as the double-slide method.
  • Preliminary findings suggest the single-slide technique is a viable alternative, though further evaluation with larger patient groups and longer follow-up is warranted.