Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Advances in urological laparoscopy

I S Gill1, R V Clayman, E M McDougall

  • 1Department of Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, USA.

The Journal of Urology
|October 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply by Authors.

The Journal of urology·2020
Same author

Reply by Authors.

The Journal of urology·2020
Same author

Association between Smoking Exposure, Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response and Survival Outcomes following Radical Cystectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The Journal of urology·2020
Same author

Live surgery: highly educational or harmful?

World journal of urology·2017
Same author

Standardization of definitions in focal therapy of prostate cancer: report from a Delphi consensus project.

World journal of urology·2016
Same author

Axl receptor tyrosine kinase is a potential therapeutic target in renal cell carcinoma.

British journal of cancer·2015

Laparoscopic urology offers reduced morbidity and faster recovery compared to open surgery, despite higher initial costs. Continued training is crucial for widespread adoption of these minimally invasive techniques.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Urological Procedures
  • Surgical Innovation

Background:

  • Laparoscopic surgery has become the standard for most open urological procedures within five years of its introduction.
  • A critical review is necessary to evaluate the efficacy and outcomes of these rapidly adopted laparoscopic techniques.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically review the established laparoscopic urological procedures.
  • To compare the outcomes, morbidity, and costs of laparoscopic versus open surgical methods.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of over 200 articles on laparoscopic urology.
  • Classification of procedures into clinically established, anecdotal, and laboratory-based.
  • Comparative analysis of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Five clinically established laparoscopic procedures were identified.
  • Laparoscopic procedures demonstrated comparable efficacy to open surgery.
  • Laparoscopic approaches resulted in significantly lower morbidity and shorter convalescence periods, but not lower costs.

Conclusions:

  • Laparoscopic surgery in urology offers clear benefits in reduced morbidity and recovery time, characteristic of minimally invasive surgery.
  • The time-consuming and costly aspects of laparoscopy are outweighed by patient benefits.
  • Enhanced dissemination of laparoscopic skills via postgraduate and residency training programs is essential.