Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Euthanasia: American attitudes toward the physician's role

D P Caddell1, R R Newton

  • 1Department of Sociology, Seattle Pacific University, WA 98119, USA.

Social Science & Medicine (1982)
|June 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

American public opinion supports physician-assisted euthanasia for terminally ill patients. Acceptance is higher among educated, liberal individuals with less religious self-perception, distinguishing it from patient suicide.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Children and youth in foster care: distangling the relationship between problem behaviors and number of placements.

Child abuse & neglect·2000
Same author

Assessment of intimate partner violence among high-risk postpartum mothers: concordance of clinical measures.

Women & health·2000
Same author

The heterogeneity of children and their experiences in kinship care.

Child welfare·2000
Same author

Attitudes of medical professionals toward euthanasia.

Social science & medicine (1982)·1993
Same author

Rorschach responses in healthy, community dwelling older adults.

Journal of personality assessment·1990
Same author

Reusables vs. disposables.

Health care·1984

Area of Science:

  • Sociology
  • Medical Ethics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Public opinion on end-of-life decisions is crucial for policy development.
  • Understanding the factors influencing views on euthanasia is essential for healthcare providers and ethicists.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine American public opinion on euthanasia and the physician's role.
  • To investigate how religious affiliation, self-perception, political views, and education influence these opinions.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of a large dataset (8384 respondents) from the General Social Survey (1977-1988).
  • Statistical examination of correlations between demographic/attitudinal variables and opinions on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide.

Main Results:

Keywords:
Death and EuthanasiaEmpirical Approach

Related Experiment Videos

  • Highly educated, politically liberal individuals with less religious self-perception are more likely to accept active euthanasia or suicide for terminally ill patients.
  • A significant distinction exists in public perception between patient suicide and physician-assisted euthanasia, with a preference for the latter.
  • Religious affiliation and education levels significantly impact the perceived distinction between active euthanasia and suicide.

Conclusions:

  • Sociodemographic and attitudinal factors significantly shape public acceptance of euthanasia.
  • Americans generally differentiate between suicide and physician-assisted dying, favoring physician involvement.
  • Further research into the nuances of public perception regarding end-of-life choices is warranted.